Best of 00s

With 2009 quickly coming to an end, literally one day left, I thought I'd jump into the best of fray. .

Back to Basics- Christina Aguilera- Can't get anymore conceptual than this. The only major hit on the album was 'Ain't no other Man' but the album follows in line with that single's vibe. Unfortunately, I think she just included too much material. She should have limited it to one disk. Overall, undeniably some of the best singing by a female artist.

Hotel Paper- Michelle Branch - Another good album, it could have made my underrated list, but she actually did have at least two hits from this disk. If you're into singer/ songwriters, Michelle Branch is your girl. She's not the best singer, but like so many other pop girls, she's not trying to be. The lyrics on songs like the title track, 'Hotel Paper' capture her vulnerability as an artist.

Hot Fuss- The Killers - I'm a sucker for anything 80s and when an album has a quintessential 80s sound, I'm all over it. Enter The Killers, 2004 release, everything from cheeky lyrics, to bombastic style, these guys were definitely channelling 80s new wave synthpop/rock.

Other favorites,

White Stripes- Elephant- 2003

Lady Gaga- The Fame- 2008

Alicia Keys- Diary- 2003

Mary J. Blige- No More Drama- 2002

N.E.R.D- In Search of- 2001

Pink- I'm Not Dead- 2006

Madonna- Music- 2000

Sade- Lover's Rock- 2000

Underrated and Overlooked,Albums of the 00's

Two years ago I posted a blog, ranting about Vh-1's show about the 00's. It was another installment of their I love the Decade series. I thought, "it's too soon, it is fall 2007." Now, it is time, the exigence it's here. Vh-1 rollout the 00's. With all the discussion on blogs about the top selling albums of the decade, (Billboard just reported that NYSNC - No Strings Attached is the top selling album of the decade-10million) I thought I would devote a blog to some of the albums that didn't get the radio attention or acclaim they deserved.

En Vogue- Masterpiece Theatre- released May 2000

If you're scratching your head, you're probably not alone. En Vogue? En Vogue reached the height of there popularity in the early to mid 90s. They started as a 4-member girl group, Dawn Robinson left the group in 1996 before they dropped their 3rd album, EV3. In 2000, the remaining members released, Masterpiece Theatre. The first single 'Riddle' gained some airplay, but by industry standards the album was a failure. The album was some of the groups best work, showcasing a rich depth lyrically. And vocally,Cindy, Maxine, and Terry hit their stride on this disk. Their harmonies were powerful . Each voice, distinctive (you know who is singing) which for a girl group is quite refreshing. Were there no Destiny's Child, En Vogue may have done better in 2000. Go grab this album, or download these singles- 'Riddle', 'Love U Crazy,' 'Que Sera, Sera', and 'Those Dogs'.

Lamya- Learning From Falling- 2002

You may really scratch you head on this artist. Lamya found minimal success with two singles, 'Empires' and 'Black Mona Lisa', both were remixed and faired will on the Billboard dance charts. Sleek production and poetic lyrics color this album. Lamya was one of those introspective artist that don't come along often enough in pop music. Her voice was refined, yet unique. In the vain of Sade and Dido, Lamya was definitely a chanteuse worth consideration, unfortunately she passed away in January 2009, yet her music still lives. Download- 'Empires' , 'Never Enough', 'Judas Kiss', and 'Full Frontal Fridays.'

Little Jackie- The Stoop- 2008- This is just a really fantastic pop album. Imman Coppolla and Adam Pallin make up this duo. Live instruments, funny, catchy, and relevant lyrics make this album a gem.

Cyndi Lauper- Bring Ya the Brink- 2008- 80s infused pop flair, with that classic Cyndi sound sketched into each song.

Roisin Murphy- Overpowered- 2008- Eclectic and stylistically quirky, electric dance music at it's best

Jody Watley- Midnight Lounge- 2001- Seductive and mellow, a perfect blend of disco and electronic

Robin Thicke- A Beautiful World- 2003- charismatic Blue eyed soul , rich and bold, retro meets hip-hop.

Kelis hits hard with a new single & new album

10 years ago,an overtly eccentric, saucy, retro-stylish r&b/pop singer exploded on to the pop scene, her name was [is] Kelis. Her first single, 'Caught Out There' gained some traction on TRL [Total request Live], a show on MTV that actual focused on videos, go figure. In a time when Britney, Christina, and Jessica, dominated the airwaves, Kelis emerged as the sort of anti-pop girl. She was in-your face, raw, and well, interesting. Her curly afro-esque orange hair, her tall model-esque stature, combined with an articulate and not so urban dialect made for a divergent artist, one people weren't sure how to categorize. She wasn't quite pop because her music had a distinctive hip-hop flair [she was one of the Neptune's first production] and she wasn't completely r&b either. Unique, and street wise, she found an audience in Europe, where he first album did considerably well. Her second album, 'Wanderland', didn't fair well in the U.S. The first single, 'Young, Fresh and New' received minimal airplay at best. However, once again, the Brits ate it up. Finally, in 2003, Kelis scored big with 'Milkshake', the first single off the 'Tasty' album was a worldwide hit. In part due to the infectious Neptunes beat and her sultry sexed-up vocals, Kelis gained some much deserved attention. Unfortunately, 'Milkshake' was the album's only hit. Three years later, she released 'Kelis was Here' a mundane title for another underrated album. She parted ways with the Neptunes on this disc. Still, even with help from hitmaker, Will.I.am, there were some high and low moments on the disk. It lacked any real top 40 radio ready songs. Now, Kelis is about to drop her 5th studio album, due in 2010. I'm a fan and I can't wait. The first single entitled, 'Acapella' is a David Guetta produced electro/disco treat. Anything with Guetta behind it and I'm sold.

Fake is the New Real, but Compared to What?

http://
I'm sure most of you are familiar with the phrase "image is everything" if not, you probably have lived under a rock of some sort for the past 20 years. This phrase, although common and probably a bit nonsensical, still truly embodies a seemingly ubiquitous metaphor for reality television. Take for example the new reality show premiering on MTV tonight, Jersey Shore. The show follows the lives of self-identified "Guido's". What is a Guido? Someone of Italian decent, wears his hair high, [for guys this usually means spiked], is a gym rat, and uber tan. You've seen this guy in the gym, always looking at his abs; his muscles are juiced; and his attitude, well, cocky and arrogant are two adjectives that come to mind. And here it is folks, an image, one that is marketable , sellable. It's the commodification of a type, more specifically a style. Some critics condemn networks, like MTV for promoting and complicity perpetuating negative stereotypical images, in particular on Jersey Shore, the "Guido". And like most in its genre, the show has a particular audience that it will appeal to, young, tan, 2o somethings, that bask in overly indulgent narcissism. A network like MTV, isn't going to take the moral high ground here, remember "From G's to Gents", which was probably a euphemism for another word, beginning with "N" ending with "A". Shows like the latter are standard production for MTV. My point is that in a world of images, reality television will continue to glamorize any style that carries meaning for a particular culture. Any identity can be sold as real, even if it is really fake, as long as there are buyers willing to consume it.

I Look to You***

Last week Whitney Houston released her long awaited 6th, [I am not including The Bodyguard Soundtrack] studio album. I've contemplated ways to describe her latest set of 11 tracks and today, the analogy or should I say memory hit me.

It was Spring 1997 and like most high school seniors, I was totally ecstatic about Prom. I looked dashing in my tux [my mom told me so]. I had the hot girl [too bad I wasn't really into her]. I would have much rather had my secret crush, a guy I sat behind in my algebra I class my junior year. So, off my date and I went, hand in hand. After we ate dinner with my best friend and his date, we went on our merry way to the statehouse convention, where our Prom was held. We arrived about an hour after it started and stayed about maybe 45 minutes, long enough to take pictures and mingle with our friends. Then we left. I took my date home. Once we got to her house, I walked her to the door. She gave me a kiss and sent me on my way. I got back in my car,sat there for a moment, and thought "is that all there is." And, that is how my Prom night ended. I went home, got out of my dashing tux, and went to sleep. The next day I felt completely spiritless. Prom was so lukewarm. Were my expectations too high? I didn't expect to have sex, in fact it was the last thing I wanted. We were friends and I only wanted her on my arm because she was one of the popular girls, by high school standards anyway. But, Prom itself, the event was so underwhelming. And, that truly is how I feel about Whitney Houston's album, I Look to You. Like Prom, it's just ok.

If you're looking for Whitney of yesterday, then you'll be really disappointed. No soaring crescendo type ballads, leading to possibly glass breaking high notes. Instead, her vocal stylings are husky and hoarse, a distant departure from hits like, I'm your Baby tonight, or Didn't we almost have it All. Still, Whitney manages to keep her sound, the musicality of the album current. On tracks like Million Dollar Bill and For The Lovers, Houston does offer some head bopping, booty shaking bumping and grinding moments. And, if that's what you want, then you'll love the album. The slower jams are nice, good even, but not great. I Look to You is an acceptable relatively middle of the road type comeback. Although Whitney likes to say this album is not a comeback,.. well you be the judge.

Idiocracy: America Land of the what?

Current Health Care Reform debates, [I use that term loosely] and the town hall meeting discussions[even more loosely] both clearly illuminate America's tepid free fall into a land full of idiots. Harsh words, maybe, but simply take a look around at attitudizing customer service workers, entertainment news media, but really politics in particular. Words like Socialism, Fascist, Racist, Vampires, Rapists, Death panels, Nazi, Euthanasia, and the list goes on, continue to float out of mainly Republican pundits mouths way too easily, without any concern or regard for the outcome. Well, free speech is a wonderful thing and I would never advocate censorship. But, the reality is we live in a society in which opinion is often ingested as fact. I would discuss the birther movement, but that's too easy. Something so ridiculous should have never gained traction in this country, but again to the point of this blog, idiots consume and color the the landscape.

Simply look at health care town hall rallies across the country a place where sensible and reasoned discussion should take place has instead become a breeding ground for idiots and charlatans, taking their propaganda and spreading it like wildfire. People [citizens] should know that Nationalized Health Care will not take away anyone's ability to choose. Likewise, consider other government institutions, the postal service or public education, both compete against private corporations or entities.

For example, consider this, if you don't want your child to go to public schools, then guess what? Little Suzie or Johnny don't have to go. As a parent, you can choose to send them to a private school. And, do we all [American citizens] pay for public education? Absolutely! I am a single man with no dependents. Can you guess how much more I pay in taxes than a married couple with children? A lot! Do I care? No! I realize a function of the federal government is to empower it's citizens. Education is central to and for a well maintained and functioning society. It's no accident that a society which glorifies ignorance is also hell bent on opposing government programs that will ideally benefit the vast majority of Americans. Why? Because idiots generally lack empathy. They have a more nationalist worldview that eagerly attaches to "us" vs. "them" rants. The kind of thinking that leaves little room for progress.We can have discussions about controlling cost and reforming a broken system. Let's not have a discussion that is seeped in fear and trepidation. So to all those Americans who are so afraid right now, take note. Your country is still yours. No one has taken anything away from you. If you like a federal government that runs on autopilot then get ready for a weakened infrastructure, lack luster public facilities, and protections, when the storm approaches and the levees break, don't cry to the federal government because you supported cutting the program aimed at fixing and maintaining the foundation.

Divalicious Moment # 2 Jody Watley

Strike a pose! VOGUE! This line from Madonna’s 1990 hit sparked a global interest in this gay urban street dance style. And, although Madonna is usually given mainstream credit for bring voguing to the masses, it was another diva that really tapped into this stylistic and queer dance craze; her name is Jody Watley and she is the subject of this Divialicious moment # 2. Jody Watley first began her career in the late 70s on the popular television show Soul Train as one of its featured dancers. A few years later in the early 80s she, along with Howard Hewitt and Jeffery Daniel formed the pop/R&B group Shalamar. They held mediocre success, especially given today’s standards, with hits such as A Night to Remember and The Second Time Around. I can remember rummaging through my dad’s album collection and jamming to some of their songs. Then a few years later it happened, I saw this goddess dancing in a video. She wore huge loop earrings, black heels, black hose under a black skirt that resembled fishnet stockings, a black off the shoulder top that revealed her belly button along with black chains and rings, the pitch black big hair, those cheekbones, a killer black assemble theme. Almost unrecognizable from her Shalamar days, it was Jody Watley singing about finding a new love. She was like an edgier more grown-up version of Janet Jackson in the late eightes. Her style was truly unique and identifiable. She was like this really fierce campy drag queen. So, you know I was hooked. Maybe she was the root for my fascination with drag and female impersonation. In probably one of her least successful singles from her first solo album, the video for Still a Thrill, housed voguing. That’s right kids, Jody was voguing before Madonna. Give her props. In a career that spans well over 20 years, I still love me some Jody.

Favorite Jody Songs
12. I’m the one you need
11. Love Injection
10. Don’t you want me
9. Some Kind of lover
8. Real Love
7. Friends
6. Everything
5. I want you
4. Most of All
3. Ecstasy
2. Looking For a New Love
1. Still A Thrill (she really should re-release this song; it was so before it’s time)

Check out the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nArOa8OViw

CNN and Tyler Perry

For me, representation is mostly about style, and like many of my blog post, I’ve tried to air on the side of caution in putting too much stock into what gets produced for mainstream audiences. But, it would be foolish to think that representations in movies or on television do not affect the populous perceptions about particular social groups. To what degree, of course it is debatable. But, most of you reading this might agree that appearances, no matter how subtle, subverse, or flamboyant are nonetheless seductive.
I want to take a moment and discuss Tyler Perry, the reigning king for producing and directing movies geared toward predominantly African-American audiences. In the past 5 years Tyler Perry movies have become a staple among black audiences. Perry is the first African American to own a major film and TV studio. He has taken his Madea character, which originated in his plays, and transformed his drag performance into money making enterprise. And, make no mistake it is a drag performance, one in which could have some positive effects for the gay community’s relationship with the black community. I’ll return to this point.
In terms of story telling, the first main problem I have with Perry is his transparent and over the top plot structure. He uses the same narrative throughout most of his films. Character A is a tragically flawed person or victim of social circumstance, he or she, usually a woman, meets Character B, a man, who is explicitly cast as the ultra masculine, confident, yet humble man. She [Character A] refuses [Character B’s] advances at first. Finally, through some great epiphany her eyes are opened. She falls in love and finds her way back to the man and God. [Interestingly enough can you see the man/God parallels here; you (a woman) need a man and you need God] I realize that was a real brief generalization, but it’s pretty much the basic structure, girl meets boy. Of course, he has various, mildly intriguing characters covering the landscape; and, Madea is obviously the comedy relief for the stories depicting her character, too.
Secondly, I find the constant reinforcement of Christian religious undertones throughout his movies extremely problematic. Yes, a lot of black folks enjoy and love praising Jesus, and maybe that’s the audience Perry is only concerned with influencing. He has created a niche for himself that seems to be working well, monetarily. And, he is giving a lot of black actors’ work, which is a great thing. But, why is he the only voice, giving life on the big screen to black experiences? Not every black experience in America is centered around and dominated by the church, which is what most of his movies would suggests. This single and monolithic vision for depicting the black experience is one dimensional, but it’s what dominates in the media. And it is all too often the kind of representation that gets cast as “authentically black,” [check out CNN’s Black in American II coverage, I’m sure black folks and church will encompass most of the conversation]

Divalicious Moment # 1

This is the first installment of what I'd like to call my Divalicious Moments. The moment can be anything from an old school R&B video or a new pop song. What's important is that the female vocalist does something memorable in a performance or song, which captures my interest, prompting me to sample their repertoire of music. Some will be powerhouse vocalist and some won't. Basically, old or new music, it doesn't matter because these are the women that have the "IT" factor; I call them Divalicious. Look for blogs about female vocalist that I feel really encapsulate the word DIVA.

D= Delightfully charming,

I= Incredibly talented,

V=Vocal gymnast

A=Authentic performer, that is a Diva.

The first on my list is the audacious vocal styling of Stephanie Mills. This woman gives singing a whole new meaning. She can take a song and infuse so much emotion and strength into it. Sadly, she was so underrated in the 80s. She was pigeonholed as a R&B artist, making it that much harder to crack that mainstream pop ceiling. Regardless of success, she is totally fabulous.

Here's a little bit of trivia for you about Ms. Mills. She briefly dated Michael Jackson in the late 70s while she performed on Broadway as Dorothy in The Wiz. Cheers to you Stephanie.

My top Ten List

10. Whacha going to do with my Lovin

09. (I've learned to Respect) The Power of Love

08. I feel good all over

07. I Never knew Love like this before (such a gem)

06. You're Puttin a Rush on Me

05. All Day, All Night

04. Home

03. Feel the Fire

02. Comfort of a Man

01. Something in the Way you make me Feel (check out the video)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3pS1Ig5N2Y

It would seem given this past weekend’s box office numbers that Sacha Cohen’s latest attempt at supreme satirical profundity is a major hit, slam-dunk. But, I guess that would depend on your definition of what makes for a box office hit. And, of course many of you may consider these questions: Did it fit into your idea of a comedy? Did it make you laugh? Did it offend you? Did it disgust you? Most moviegoers whom flocked to see Bruno may have left feeling a host of adjectives after viewing Cohen’s creation.
Bruno, unlike his predecessor Borat, is far less universally likable, yet he’s more infectious. The multi-layered movie has so many rhetorical dimensions that deserve discussion. Yet, I’m going to focus on the obvious one. For many, the characterization of Bruno was offensive to gay Americans and this movie was simply another in a line of continued perpetuated negative stereotypes?
Let’s back track for a minute, and consider the idea of “social contracts”. MySpace, Face book, and maybe even Twitter to a certain degree all form various functions as social networking cites. But, they also reveal some pretty interesting things about human interaction and the expectations that exist. For example, what happens when you send someone, let’s say a really hot guy a friend request, you two share friends, run in the same circles, have similar interest, thus it’s seems you two are primed for a great friendship. Well a day goes by, then two, then three, then a week, and now its two weeks and he hasn’t accepted your request. What gives? You feel perturbed, unsure, and insecure possibly. Why? Because he didn’t keep or meet your or the unspoken rules that dominate social networks. Most people that run in the same circles will generally accept one another’s friend request. But he didn’t accept yours. Consider this statement, “when expectations are not filled is when we realize we’ve made assumptions about what the person “ought” to be (Goffman). The point here is that Bruno, the character, represents an assumption about what gay depictions should not be.
Bruno may be an archetype of the overtly flamboyant gay male stereotype seen in Hollywood movies for ages. But, Bruno isn’t an every [gay] man personality and shouldn’t be seen as such. What’s laudable about this character is that he takes a lead role. The story develops around his adventures. He is not the sidekick or supporting character giving meaning to another character’s moral dilemma. Bruno takes center stage. And, he may not fit an ideal role model for gay men, but keep in mind Cohen’s intention is not to cast Bruno as a role model per se. Leave those characterizations to the Sean Penn’s of the world. Is this a politically incorrect movie? Absolutely! Often that is what comedy and satire is all about, making you [the audience] uncomfortable, uneasy, and a bit anxious. Those are the emotions that make you question and critically think about your beliefs, attitudes, and opinions. [Hooray for critical thinking!]
Bruno’s antics are shockingly ridiculous and outrageous to say the least. But, let’s keep in mind that aside from his sexuality, they would still be shockingly ridiculous and outrageous, think Johnny Knoxville in Jackass.
I think what floats below the radar, and possibly what might strike some as offensive or inordinate behavior is his refusal to successfully cover/pass his identity. There is no mistaking Bruno is really gay. In the movie, Bruno is a complete effeminate narcissist. His adventure to America is an attempt to absorb himself into the shallow and vain arena of celebrity hood. He fails. And, subsequently believes he must become “straight” or “straight acting” to survive as a viable pop media star. Essentially, he tries to “hide” what and who he is in order to fit in, thus gaining acceptance. Of course, he doesn’t cover or pass well enough. He soon realizes that he’s gone astray and like most fairytale type stories he marries his prince in the end.[Happy Ending] Still, Bruno only feels stigmatized when he identifies his nature/sexuality as the culprit, keeping him from his goals.. For Bruno, what he does is normal. He is normal. It is not until his dreams in America are not realized that he becomes a somewhat tragic or self-loathing character. Otherwise, he flaunts and reveals in his sexuality with childlike abandon. Now, isn’t that what Gay Pride is all about. Sure looks that way at most of the parades I’ve attended. Thus, for me, outside of the lute, obscene, and questionably moral behavior, I think Bruno only loosely perpetuates a gay stereotype if you look at the character with that particular social frame in mind, given the fact that it is a “straight” actor sort of putting on the armor of a gay male. On a broader scale it is the classic tale of self-acceptance, with lots of raw and raunchy jokes coloring the landscape. Of course whether or not the movie does anything to really expose homophobia, or empower it, I guess the jury’s still out?

Bill O'Reilly on Michael Jackson

Here again I’m amazed at the simple minded approach Bill O’Reilly peddles through to his viewers on Fox. Should I be surprised; hell No! O’Reilly is an expert at stripping any topic down to its most base and simplistic level, then of course positioning himself as the authoritative expert. In other words, he frames the discussion and tries to pass his opinion off as fact. How does he do this you wonder; well let’s take a minute, albeit a long minute, which is more time than he deserves and deconstruct his approach.
Here is the link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/gretchen-carlson-michael_n_226707.html
Last night on his show, O’Reilly along with his two cheerleaders ponder this question; “Why are Black Americans so interested in a Guy with White kids and a face?” First, the question itself positions black Americans as being somehow misguided in their adulation for Jackson. A more general question to ponder may have read; “Why is the American public so interested in Michael Jackson?” It is a less nuanced question, but one that is much more inclusive because it doesn’t allow O’Reilly to subtly play the race card. What he suggests to his predominately white audience is that “those black folks, they are so silly, going on and on about that man who didn’t even like the color of his black skin.” Watch the clip; it is pretty much what O’Reilly is suggesting. When one of his co-host attempts to fire back, offering a bit of rationalization for Jackson’s appeal to blacks, “he was one of the first African-American crossover artists in pop music.” O’Reilly immediately interjects. Remember in his infinite wisdom he knows best, or everything. He claims Jackson was not the “First” to crossover pop artist, appealing to both black and white audiences. Mr. O’Reilly, he was not the “First” but he was surely a part of the pack that history considers the “First”. He continues to argue that other Motown artists were doing that long before Jackson. Ah, Bill you forget; Jackson was a Motown artist; the Jackson 5 were apart of that push into mainstream pop for African-Americans.
And, as an adult artist, although not the first black artist to be played on MTV, his success on the station was far more influential for generations to come. Consider this, although Susan B. Anthony, Madeline Albright, Maxine Waters, and Geraldine Ferraro were some of the “first” to crack the ceiling for women in politics, it is most likely Hilary Clinton’s 2008 run for the Democratic nomination that people will remember and the case that history will cite as being the most influential, thus far.
O’Reilly once again you treat your audience to minimalist thinking. Simply put, because Michael Jackson’s skin color changed doesn’t negate the fact that his musical success is some how less than to African-Americans. And, to answer your question, African Americans claim Jackson because there is a history in the culture to laud and be loyal to celebrities, especially in music and sports.
But, I realize that at times that adulation and loyalty may be miss-appropriated and in it, opportunities for engaging criticism are lost. The real analysis O’Reilly could have expressed or exposed, instead of the racial issue, is gender expression & sexuality issue, and how despairingly pervasive homophobia in the black community still is. For me, Jackson was a stark reminder of how many individuals in the black community are slow to embrace difference, especially if it doesn’t fit the community’s social script for masculinity. Questions about Michael Jackson’s sexuality were so ubiquitous in the black community that he became the standard joke. The man was ridiculed and seen as somehow less than. His effeminate behavior was characteristically patronized as something tragic. But, O’Reilly really doesn’t have the balls [or academic background] to supply a deeper analysis here, one that doesn’t placate to his audience’s sensibilities. O’Reilly you’ve cried wolf too many times to now try and sit in judgment on a topic that does deserve attention. Maybe his criticism was an attempt to shine a light on an inconsistent view, but seeing this man in action, I seriously doubt it. He lacks total credibility.
Still, it’s no secret that the Michael Jackson was an eccentric man. He was not your average Joe, so to speak, which most artistic people are not. He was a true iconoclastic personality, challenging traditional notions of masculinity and race.

Lady Gaga, the New What?

Cher, Madonna, Tina, & Aretha, what do these women have in common? Well, they are legendary, iconic and they’ve been recording music for the last 50+ years, excluding Madonna, 30+ years for her. Cher has her own show in Vegas, Tina just wrapped another world tour last year, and Aretha graces us at prominent industry events, where she can control the air conditioning, now that is a diva. And Madonna’s last two tours have grossed millions upon millions of dollars. These women all for me represent longevity and relevance. Longevity because let’s face it, if you can still pull crowds and keep people interested as long as they have, then they’ve got to be doing something right. They are relevant because each continue to influence female artistry today. So to the Question is Lady Gaga the next Madonna? First, it’s a loaded question, too many variables to consider. Who is Lady Gaga influencing? Will her next album tank? Is she a fad? Is she the next Madonna, probably not, but she is a breath of fresh air. I like her image and performance style; she’s different. That is where I draw the line. Come on peeps, we don’t need another hero; Madonna still gets my vote.

The “We want it NOW!” Generation

After President Obama held a celebration dinner/event honoring the Stonewall riots, he addressed a group of strategy members for LGBT rights. Throwing a bone, nice gesture Mr. President, actually it’s a definite step in the right direction and one I’m not surprised to see this President take. Although not the first to honor Gay Pride month, former President Clinton recognized it during his administration, too, just not as flashy, no formal dinner. President Obama is encouraging conversation and action. I believe that is the best place to start. LGBT rights are not invisible, as with the former Bush administration.
Still, I have to wonder about the urgency of so many gay activists whom seem disillusioned with this President’s administration.
Yes, the Justice Department’s brief about Don’t ask don’t tell was [is] deplorable. I can’t believe something so entrenched in closed minded stereotypical thinking came to life. But, activist should vent, and not lose sight of the bigger picture. Could President Obama immediately satisfy the gay communities’ needs? Yes! I believe he possibly could, or at least keep people from losing their jobs in the military, maybe a freeze on the policy.
But, I also believe taking the legislative route at this point is a very pragmatic approach. He wants to make sure every “T” is crossed and all the “I’s” are dotted. And, why would the gay community want anything less?
I think as a community we are too focused in on feel good now politics. Let me explain that description. One thing that I really admire about the civil rights movements in the 60s was its commitment to future generations. Leaders like MLK, Malcolm X, and Thurgood Marshall were all visionaries. They knew that their protest and demonstrations for equal rights and access might take years or decades. Their work was for future generations, so they could succeed. They were willing to suffer if it meant a future granddaughter or grandson wouldn’t have to bear the impact of segregation or discrimination. I guess it’s a more Booker T Washington incremental approach than most activists would like, but it does work. Yes, gains in the civil rights movement did come to a head in 1964, but that was 10 years after the landmark Brown vs. Board decision. So, I think the mindset of the Gay Rights movement has to change. Patience is not always a bad thing; I’ve heard it builds character. It may not bear the fruits of the work done toward equal rights today, but it will for future generations. This isn’t a passive approach; it’s one that places value in a future that will happen. I’m sure those men and women who stood up for their rights 40 years ago did it with the hope that today, future generations could walk with their heads held a little higher, and today; I do.

One of Pop Culture's True Icons, Michael Jackson embodied so much of what pop music is today. His influence is undeniable,thus his memory will live forever. My heart goes out to his family and friends.

Top 15 Favorite Michael Jackson Songs

1. Off the Wall


2. Wanna Be Starting Something


3. P.Y.T Pretty Young Thing


4. Beat it


5. Billie Jean


6. It's the Falling in Love


7. Man in the Mirror


8. Smooth Criminal


9. Baby Be Mine


10. Bad


11. Leave Me Alone


12. Who's is it


13. Remember the Time


14. Thriller


15. Don't Stop til You get Enough

Black Eyed Peas, The E.N.D Energy Never Dies*****

On their 4th studio disk they deliver an array of electro-styled or infused Pop and R&B gems. This is the party album of the year. Will-I-am’s production and vocal manipulation on tracks like Rock your Body, Imma Be, and I Gotta Feeling, are a refreshing departure from some of the more overly zealous and produced arrangements dominating radio today. By the way, who are the other two guys? They seem to fly under the radar on this disk, which is fine with me. I’m all about Fergie and this disk is full of the fergalicious one herself. Go and get The E.N.D. or download these, Meet Me Halfway, Out of my Head, and The Showdown.

Ne-Yo Mis-leads Young Women

In a recent boombox.com article, Ne-Yo, the R&B crooner dispenses some not so “real” advice to a young and aspiring female singer. He basically says if you’re a fat, step back. Not in so few words, but that is definitely how this possibly very impressionable young woman and broader audience will ingest it. Of course Ne-Yo is entitled to his informed opinion. He lives and breathes the music industry. Still, when I read these kinds of comments, I am always baffled by the commentator’s lack of empathy.
Now, I did only read a portion of the blog, maybe his comments were taking out of context and if so, I should probably reserve judgment. But, I’ll go the way of Fox News on this one and call it, before I have all the information, which may ultimately undermine my stance, oh well, go with me on this one.
I do believe there is something destructive about those remarks, possibly my feminist leanings or something. I guess what Ne-Yo is really saying to these girls is prepare yourselves. The music industry today is primarily style over substance. Of course, when both talent and looks lie in one person, then she’s a package deal. But, really his comments speak to the pervasive beauty myth in our culture about women’s bodies. For him to suggest that artist, such as Jill Scott or Jennifer Hudson’s success isn’t comparable to Beyonce’s simply doesn't follow. Success is subjective, and these women have all reached a pinnacle of success that is laudable.
Beyonce mostly sells sex and fantasy in her music. The latter two don’t. Or not to the degree that Beyonce does. Maybe Ne-Yo should revise his comments, if you want to be a sex symbol, in the music industry, then you’ll need to lose weight, assuming you’re an overweight aspiring singer. Of course, the parameters for weight, acceptable or commercially viable weight constantly change. To see a “big” woman dance like Beyonce often becomes parody in our culture, it’s not sexy ( think Mo’nique at the Bet Awards three years ago). As Issac Mizahi says on The Fashion Show, “Sorry honey we’re just not buying it.” And so, so the public generally has a very one-dimensional view of female sexuality. Ne-Yo, when you make such an ill-conceived generalization you suggests to young women that their success is dependent on their weight. You then minimize the success of artists like Jill Scott, Jennifer Hudson, Adele, Kelly Clarkson, and Jordan Sparks because these women do not fit the culturally accepted script for “sexiness” is frankly complicit sexism.
Sad, but true are the realities of the industry, but there are just as many skinny or physically fit girls who have not reached the success of Beyonce. So, his advice and argument is basically ad hominem thinking. Here’s my advice, focus on your talent first, if you’ve got the goods, you’ll at least get your foot in the door. If you want mainstream success, of course you’ll have to be marketable, but don’t let that fact deter or defer your dreams.

http://www.theboombox.com/2009/06/23/ne-yo-to-aspiring-singer-lose-weight-if-you-want-to-be-a-star/

Perez Hilton & The “F” word

Earlier this week all the blogs were ablaze reporting the out-spoken and controversial blogger Perez’s Hilton's confrontation at a popular West coast night club with the Black Eye Peas manager. First, it goes with saying, but I’ll say it anyway, no matter what Hilton said, he didn’t deserve to get punched. And from what it looks like, he got the _ _ _ _ knocked out of him. Everyone condemned Chris Brown for his brutal attack, so the same should apply to the B.E.P’s manager. But, I think public attention is more focused on the gay slur Hilton hurled at the B.E.P’s manager. So, it seems a case of clear violent behavior is now overshadowed by Hilton’s speech.
I don’t like Hilton. He does post some funny, crazy, ridiculous celebrity gossip on his blog. But, he just seems very annoying and fake. Like most 15 minute fame pseudo celebs he thinks he’s actually important.
Still, I do question why Hilton felt no other word in the English language could express his feelings. Of course, I’m guilty of saying things like, “oh you’re so gay, or that’s so gay, or even you fag.” But, and a pretty big one I might add. It’s all about context and intent. And, given the context of Hilton’s confrontation, and his own admission, he was using the word in the most hurtful way.
And, some gay activist would charge that in the heat of the moment he became like all those small minded and bigoted people who throw that slur at gay men daily. Hilton writes, "Words can hurt. I know that very well, from both sides of the fence. The other night in Toronto, after feeling physically threatened by a verbally abusive will.i.am of the Black Eyed Peas, I chose the most hurtful word I know to hurl at him. I was in an out-of-the ordinary situation and used a word that I would not utter under normal circumstances." While I disagree with his word choice, he wasn’t exercising clear judgment, as is common among politicians these days, he “mis-spoke.” I’m all for political correctness, but sometimes emotions get the best of people, hell, most of the time. So, I think it’s a little premature to argue that Hilton’s comment was anything other than an angry and upset person exercising poor judgment. Yes, as a gay man himself, he shouldn’t have called the B.E.P’s manager a faggot. But, I think it’s slightly disingenuous to suggest that his use of the word is somehow analogous to say Isaiah Washington’s rant.

Black Princess=Black Prince,hmm...Really?

How appropriate that in the same year America (USA), gets its first African-American (bi-racial) president that Disney is about to release, in December 2009, its first African-American princess. YAY! Cheers, applause, shouts, and what ever else excited people do. A step in the right direction, black representation, pandering to a specific audience, does Disney see the dollar signs; I'm sure there are an endless list of possibilities for this black princess's sudden arrival. But, who cares? I don't. I'll tell you what I do care about. I think it is important and significant that in a highly visual culture that the diversity of the landscape is represented on television and in film. I am firm believer that our sometimes mindless forms of entertainment do have a way of influencing our thinking. That is why the stereotype often becomes reality. It's the signs of life in our culture and how we oftentimes come to learn about things or people that may seem somewhat removed from our social circles.

A bit of history, and feel free to skip this, but it's history, please read it. In the years proceeding the landmark Brown vs. Board of education case in 1959, the case outlawing segregation in public schools, attorney Thurgood Marshall had to present evidence which proved segregation, the separate and very unequal status of African-American schooling, had harmful effects on the self-concept, esteem, etc... of African-American students. He cited the studies of psychologist Kenneth Clark, which I think was reffered to as footnote 13. At the time Clark's worked centered around the deleterious effects of segregation on black children in public schools. In one of his many experiments, he conducted a doll favorably test so to speak, on a random number of black girls in which they were given dolls of all colors to play. When asked which doll they preferred, most, if not all, favored the white dolls.

This is a sweeping generalization of his research and the experiment. But, my point here is to suggest that entertainment media images have a lot of power to reinforce and send oftentimes both subtle and blunt messages to their audience, sometimes positive, and sometimes negative. Thus, today, still the African American female presence is lacking on television and in films. Name at least 2 African American actress in a major network series right now. Oh I'm sure you can, but they are sparse to say the least. Now, Disney has a black princess and she doesn't have the black prince. I say SO WHAT? The fact that finally we see an African American princess is a thing of beauty. Change happens, albeit sometimes too slow....but when progress is made it's made.

O' Janet, where art thou?

If you know anything about me, which most of you reading this blog do, then you know I'm a huge, not literally of course, Janet Jackson fan, pushing fanatical limits. No! I'm really not a crazy Janet fan, it's not like I want to crawl up inside her and live for awhile. Gross, right? But, I bet you get my point. I like me some JANET. But, I'm feeling a little disappointed with the way her career has progressed since the now infamous wardrobe malfunction incident in 2004. Funny, before that I didn't realize one's wardrobe could malfunction. But, hey if you can have a bad hair day, surely you can have a bad wardrobe day. Nonetheless, Janet's subsequent albums since have failed to really reach the success of her previous efforts, excluding the first two Janet 1982 & Dream Street1984. Both held mediocre success. Unfortunately, DaMita Jo 2004, 20Y.O. 2006, and Discipline 2008 all suffered from any real creative ingenuity. Don't get me wrong, I love all three. But, I have to wonder would they've still performed poorly even if the Superbowl incident hadn't occurred. Who knows? I do believe Janet will reign supreme again in pop music, I suppose only time will tell. FYI, listen to "The Best things in Life are Free," "He Doesn't Know I'm alive," and "Island Life," those songs really capture Janet's angelic soprano pretty nicely.

Olberman vs. O'Reilly vs. Dr. Tiller

In thier latest battle of words, Olbermann vs. O'Reilly round 5 so to speak, finds Olbermann ronouncing and blasting O'Reilly for his vehament pro-life rhetoric. The recent slaying of late term abortion Dr. George Tiller in his local church has given Olbermann cause to cite O'Reilly for his anti-abortion campaign on his Fox News show, No Spin Zone (insert laughter here). Olbermann claims O'Reilly and his ilk are part of the problem, in that their hate speech fuels people like the gunman in this case, to act like vigilanty zealots. O'Reilly's complicit participation, albeit small, is nonetheless a part of the news pundit culture that breeds irrational and abhorant behavior. For a more detailed account visit: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/02/olbermann-fox-news .

What's really fundamental about their latest diatribe against one another is that it's all basically about free speech. First, let me make it crystal clear that I am 100% in favor of free speech. But, I realize there are great consequencesa and possibly even greater responsibilities that go along with the first admendment right (especially in a public forum).

Mr. O'Rielly, if you really operated a show that was in fact, a no spin zone, then you wouldn't begin to try and put a spin on this gunman's cowardice actions. Instead, you'd take responsibility and aknowledge the part your words might have played in inspiring such hatred. Yes, of course, you'd like to think that all your viewers are intelligent and fair-minded. And, you may believe most of them could distinguish the BS, from the acutual news you may be reporting. But, they are not, which means you, along with all the other loose-lip political pundits have a responsibilty. Yet, even if you do believe everything you said about Dr. Tiller is true, you are evoking such pathological responses from your audience that are, and could, perpetuate domestic terrorism against abortion doctors.

But, quite honestly, both Olbermann and O'Reilly know this; however, their ongoing war of words makes for good entertainment television, which is what much of cable news is, entertainment.

Girls, Girls, Girls, Summer Single Reviews

Mandy Moore- I could Break your Heart any Day of the Week ***

Mandy Moore, or Amanda Leigh, the title of the starlet's 5th studio album, boast her displaying sightlier more vocal range and variability on the album's first single. It is not the kind of girl power single I would expect from Moore, but she manages to sell the song in a cutesy , yet gritty way. The hand clap cadence and the likely lyrics could make this a hit single. Yet, I can't help but wonder what Kelly Clarkson or Pink could've done with this track. Moore lacks the strong vibrato the latter two singers can infuse into a girl power anthem. So, she leaves me wanting a little more edge on this track. And, with a title like "I could break your Heart any Day of the Week," I wonder why the in-your face attitude almost fails to convince me.

David Guetta, Featuring Kelly Rowland- When Love Takes Over****

With huge hits like, "The World is Mine and Love is Gone," Guetta has solidified himself as one of the best club djs to date. And, in the same fashion as it's predecessors, "When Love Takes Over," will not disappoint. I love this song, everything from the pulsating dance beat, to the smooth vocal stylings. YES! Miss Kelly delivers on this track. The tone in her voice is so clean, crisp, and clear, no over singing here. Maybe this Destiny's Child has finally found her voice.

Britney Spears - Radar****

WOW! It only took almost 2 years to see this song released as a single. "Radar" first appeared on Brittany's "The Blackout" CD. It was one of my favorites. She added it to the "Circus" track list and I thought, "that's strange," but, mystery solved. "Radar" is poised as the 4th single from the platinum+ pop wonderland that is the "Circus" album. I'm looking for this to be her next number 1 single.

Jessie James- Wanted***

Look for this girl to "blow-up" on the pop scene. She's incredibly hot with great vocals. That's a package deal these days, it's the whole country pop thing that Jessica Simpson has tried unsuccessfully to top. Jessie James, think Carrie Underwood with spice and attitude.

Kristinia DeBarge- Goodbye***

Daughter of James Debarge, remember the popular early 80s family group, Debarge. James Debarge is usually remembered as Janet Jackson's first husband, although the marriage was annulled after the coupled lived together for a few months. Now, that you've got the back story, onto the review. "Goodbye" is a ear-catching tune. Nothing remarkably original, but the 1969 hit "Na Na Hey Hey Kiss Him Goodbye" sample gives the track some extra appeal. Kristinia's voice isn't a powerhouse vocal, but it's pretty credulous on this dance-pop track. And, she's includes the new pop buzzword, "swagga" in the chorus, so she should score major street cred points.

Biased Schizo Media: And why you should like care

North Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, Domestic terrorism, Prop 8, GM motors, more bailouts, and economic woes, any of these sound familiar; if not, then you’ve lived under a rock for the past year. All these keywords and phrases, for me, represent some of the flood of information that seems to permeate every crevice of our culture. If you log onto any blog or web site, AOL, yahoo, MSN, Huffington post, the Drudge Report, etc… you are presented with a litany of news worthy, albeit questionable news worthy items, with up to the minute feeds, to keep you inundated with the latest information. Now, I ask, how do you process so much information at a given time? You pick what you’re interested in and toss everything else. Makes sense, you do it all time. At home, if you’re talking to your spouse, 9 times out of 10 you’re only going to process about a ¼ or what he or she said. You’ll pick out the most interesting piece of information and focus on it. I’m not really questioning our cognitive process, not much we can do to change it. But, more specifically, the way we receive information, from our “trusted” news sources. Some of the media outlets that we’ve come to trust are not very trustworthy at all it’s all filtered second, or even third hand information. In the back corners of our mind, we know it. But, it’s so easy to take it all as the gospel.

I remember watching an episode of the view a few weeks ago. The women interviewed Fox news commentator, Glenn Beck. In the interview he claimed he never checked facts. “It’s not my job.” He claimed. So, for any of you watching his show, which I cringe at the thought, remember you’re just getting his opinion, a rather uninformed one. And, like assholes, we all have one. Or a more recent story would have you believe Supreme Court nominee Sonya Sotormayor is a racist. Hmmm… but a little inspection reveals quite the opposite, in terms of her case rulings. Check out this case, Pappas v. Giuliani, in which she dissented from the lower court’s opinion ruling summary judgment to the police department. Basically, it was a case about free speech. She could have very easily sided with the lower court’s opinion, favoring the police department’s firing of an officer whom spread hate speech pamphlets on his off duty hours. If she were a racist, she’d have been salivating over a case about blatant racist speech. You know, her chance to stick it to "whitey." But, she didn’t. I report all this to make a point crystal clear. Do your homework. There is so much information being passed your way these days that you can’t rely on its factual accuracy. Even this blog, especially this blog, question, question, question, it’s the best advice I can give.

Music on My List: Spring 2009

Single Reviews
The Ting Tings: ‘That’s Not My Name’- Download it now. This is such a refreshing song in sea mundane pop bands, the Ting Tings offer a true taste of a 80s refashioned.
Chester French: ‘She Loves Everybody’- OMG, this is my new favorite. If you’re a relentless clubber, then you know this chick.
Duffy: ‘Rain on My Parade’- I love this ode to the jaunty; it’s carefree; it’s unapologetic; it’s so relevant. The kind of track you want to hear when you’re feeling on top of the world.
Kelly Clarkson: ‘I Don’t Hook-up’- Get ready for the next big angst filled girl-power anthem.
Black Eyed Peas- Boom Boom Pow- All I can say is the pulsating drum beat will have all the kids shaking their humps.

Album Reviews
Keyshia Cole: ‘A Different Me’****
o Just as the title of this CD suggest, the listener is treated to very different Cole and it doesn’t disappoint. Cole’s “different me” is confident and sexy. If you’re at all familiar with Cole’s previous hits, ‘I just Want it to be Over,’ ‘Love,’ ‘Last Night,’ or ‘Let it Go,’ then you know she’s stuck primarily to R&B influences/leanings. Cole’s eclectic 3rd album unleashes an array of musical taste. Her most avid fans shouldn’t be disappointed. The R&B grooves which are responsible for her rise to stardom are well crafted on this 14 track disc, too. Yet, it is the standout pop production on songs such as ‘Make me Over, Please Don’t Stop,’ and ‘No Other,’ that showcase Cole’s strengths as a crossover artist. Download, ‘Erotic,’ ‘Thought You Should Know,’ and ‘Please Don’t Stop’

Lily Allen ‘It’s Not Me, it’s You’****
o This musical disc is a fun ride into a quirky mind that may leave you feeling a bit mischievous. On this partly humorous and cheeky 12 track CD, Allen manages to explore in a whispery and somewhat whimsical voice the common themes of love, life, and true happiness. From the first track, in which she details how everyone’s at it (doing coke) to the eleventh in which she questions GOD’s possible dissatisfaction with his so-called followers (people of faith). Allen manages to share deeply personal stories with her audience that reveals a young woman on the brink of self-discovery. Download, ‘Everyone’s At It,’ ‘The Fear,’ and ‘Back to the Start.’

Jessica Simpson, Ghastly Faux Paux, or Grand Publicity Stunt

"Grand stands and grand slams," maybe that could work as a tag line for Jessica Simpson's career. In fact, when was the last time you heard anything about her that focused on her singing or even acting for that matter? If you haven't paid too much attention to the celebrity gossip on the "tube" (basically TMZ) lately and have no idea what I am referencing, then just go to your local grocery store. Pick up the latest issue of OK magazine or The National Inquirer. You'll see the "outfit" that's causing more drama for Ms. Simpson than any of her albums or movies. Ok, maybe that's a little harsh, but I can't help but think that the high-waisted denim jeans, the skin tight black tank top and the leopard print belt all scream one thing, "My stylist and publicist sure know how to manipulate public attention." And, why shouldn't they; it's is what celebrities pay them to do. Does she look fat? Well, depends on your definition of fat. But, mostly this isn't even about Jessica Simpson being overweight, I believe it's a desperate star trying to hold on to what little bit of fame she has left. But, she, or here people, are probably handling it the wrong way.

And, don't get me wrong, I am not trying to judge her. Well, maybe I am. But, I do realize the music industry places ridiculous standards and myths of beauty on female artist. And, I know it's become increasingly hard for women to navigate the waters of thin, too thin, skinny and fat. But, Jessica's "I am not fat" pleas just seem really disingenuous. Of course she realizes she's not fat. Still, even if she does think she's fat, she'll lose the weight so quick that to position herself as the victim of media cruelty just doesn't jive with me. She wore the outfit for publicity and it's obviously worked well, for now at least. She still needs a hit, movie, album or single.

Of course, she could begin the fat girl crusade and talk about how the entertainment industry places unfair standards on women? The public sympathy card seemed to work for Jennifer Love-Hewitt and Trya Banks. So, I ask, Jessica Simpson, ghastly fashion faux paux, or grand publicity stunt?

Releases from 2008, Reviews in 2009

My Music reviews are generally too long. I'll try my best to keep it short and simple.

Black Kids- Party Traumatic****- Go get it now. That's it. You'll love it. It's slightly on the verge of being bubble gum pop, but it works well. Their music is reminiscent of 80s new wave groups such as ABC, Flock of Seagulls and let's mix it up with a little Human League., too. Download 'I want to be your limousine"

Little Jackie- The Stoop****- Give me a black woman with big hair singing about smoking cigarettes and contemplating lesbianism and I am hooked. No, actually they are a duo "named after Lisa Lisa & Cult Jam's 1989 single "Little Jackie Wants to Be a Star" consisting of vocalist Imani Coppola and programmer Adam Pallin." But, Coppola is the star. She sings the songs with an in your face type of confidence that is really refreshing in the current sea of mundane female vocalist. She effortlessly raps and sings across each track, think Lauryn Hill circa 1998, but more fun. Download, 'Black Barbie'

Kanye West- 808s & Heartbreaks***- The musicality on this disc in undeniable. I an probably a fair weather Kanye fan, but his latest disc, has this skeptical reviewer questioning my former opinion of Mr. West's talent. If you can get past the auto tune vocal stylings, which are somewhat atrocious, then you might be able to enjoy the Cd. Lyrically it's probably some of his best writing. The production on 'Love Lock down' is hypnotic to say the least. Download, 'Amazing and Paranoid.'

Adele- 19****- I can't believe this girl is so young. Her songs depict rich experiences that her 2o years do not befit. Yet, age is only a number, right? She writes songs that have a seamless fidelity that connect you to her credulous pleas on a track like 'Chasing Pavements'. This is a young woman on the brink or cusp of stardom. :) Download 'Hometown Glory'

Michael Steele, Who?

With the historic and ground breaking election of Barack Obama, I guess Republicans are feeling left out, seems it's time to get their black man, too. Now, I am not one to downplay African-American Leadership in either political party. Representation is representation, but doesn't it seem a little fishy that Michael Steele was named the RNC's chair just after the election of an African-American to the highest office in the nation? I mean, who is Michael Steele? I wonder do Republican strategist think their base is so stupid to fall for such ploys? Then, I remember this is the party that was so excited over Sarah Palin, and then I not surprised at all. Is the Republican party setting the stage for 2012? Maybe, but it's possibly too early to speculate about our next President.

Nonetheless, in a recent speech to House Republicans, Steele states, "Bipartisanship is overrated." Now, I ask in a time of economic downturn in the United States, shouldn't our politicians do all they can to work together? Shouldn't bipartisanship be atop both party's list? Unfortunately, for us (hard-working Americans) whom actually believe government can work, speeches such as Steele's reinforce old school political separatist ideologies. And, I realize Democrats are just as guilty, (Harry Reid) please stand up. Yet, in a circuit of talk show interviews, Steele has suggested that the Republican party resume the ways of Newt Gingrich's philosophy, the "contract with America" message. Steele is blatantly branding. He's trying rile up the Republican base and engender conflict with Democratic leadership in the White house. If they can create conflict with enough dissenting voices in Washington, win the House and Senate back in 2010 and keep the bulk of their party entrenched in revisionist history about the way things used to be, then they'll have successfully made the old dogma, new again. Republican leadership is not interested in trying to cooperate with Democrats or solve America's economic problems. Instead they are interested in gaining power, maintaining power and winning elections. Still, even though Democrats do have the majority in both houses, and don't really need Republican support, it would be nice to see some conciliatory acts.