My Top 12 Pop Singles and CD's of 2007

I can’t believe another year is almost over. I guess it’s time to reflect and what better topic than music. All these songs were not major hits on the Billboard top 100, nonetheless they were my favorites of 2007.
My Favorite Songs
12. Relax, Take it Easy- Mika
I feel like I may be jumping on the bandwagon; it seems like overnight everyone is a Mika, Mika fan. But, I do like him; this should come as no surprise; he is entire album is classic eighties; so of course, I love it. ‘Relax’ is my favorite track and my 12th favorite song of 2007.

11. Tambourine- Eve
When I heard this song this summer, I wanted to jump out of my seat and shake my derriere in the house of Dareon (hope I spelled that right, sorry B). This is such a party song. Eve really out did herself on this track. I think she is one of the few female rap vocalists that can hold her own on a club track. Two thumbs up for EVE and that’s why ‘Tambourine’ is my 11th favorite song of 2007

10. Home- Daughtry
One word really describes this song for me, sappy. Daughtry really captures the emotion you feel, when you just want to go home. I felt that way at about 2:30am, drunk at a popular club here in town. There was a really scary female impersonator on stage. Her name was, well I won’t be crass and mention any names, but she recently won a contest. I’ve heard some describe that occasion saying, “she was crowned.” Hmmmm….it’s my 10th favorite song of 2007

9. Tears Dry on Their Own- Amy Winehouse
If you don’t own Amy Winehouse’s Back to Black disc (by the way 6 Grammy nominations—know may be the time to clean up your act Amy) you probably haven’t heard this song. But, it was released; it may have fared better in Europe, than it did here. However, it is a great song. I love it because it’s so unapologetic and that’s why it’s my 9th favorite song of 2007

8. No One- Alicia Keys
Powerful is the word that comes to mind when I hear this song. Alicia Keys voice is amazing. She is known for her vocal talent, but I truly believe this song sealed the deal. If you were a doubter, then this song should make you a believer, and that’s why this song is my 8th favorite of 2007.

7. Last Night- Diddy- Featuring Keyshia Cole,
I think this was my absolute favorite dance song of the summer. Aside from Diddy’s dry monotone delivery, that hard-hitting driving beat and Keyshia Cole’s vocals really brought this song to life. Cole was the only reason this song was successful; Diddy couldn’t carry a song if his life depended on it. Thanks Miss Keyshia Cole, you gave Diddy a hit and that’s why this song is my 7th favorite of 2007

6. Big Girls Don’t Cry- Fergie
Fergie’s attempt at showing some substance was received well after she flaunted her London Bridges, told us how Fergalicious “it” was, and praised the life of extravagance in Glamorous. ‘Big Girls’ was a stark contrast from her three previous singles in that she showed some vulnerability. Way to go Fergie, and that’s why ‘Big Girls’ is my 6th favorite song of 2007.

5. 1234- Fiest
I love this song; I love the childlike rhyme and with Fiest’s haunting voice create the perfect combination. And if you haven’t caught the Fiest bug yet, check out her CD; you’ll love it.

4. The Creeps- Camille Jones
This song has the most intoxicating hand clap beat; you can’t help but get drunk on the hypnotic sound. Jones’s voice, although not the strongest vocal, this song doesn’t really need it. She could really be saying anything. And virtually does; it is the beat the drives this song. ‘Creeps’ is probably one of the more underrated songs of the year, which is why I included it on my list of favorites.

3. Umbrella- Rihanna-
What can I say about this song that probably has not already been said? Like most, it was the sheepish “eh eh eh” repetition really made the song for me. I don’t know; I guess I like sheep.

I had a tie for the # 2 Spot
2. Timbaland- The Way I Are
The best synthesizer fest of 2007 and that’s about all I can say.

2. Makes Me Wonder- Maroon 5
Feel free to disagree, but I think this is the most melodic song of 2007. Although this song is really too popish for the group, I do think it was the right kind of song, a great blend of pop and soul for their sophomore effort.

# 1. Who Knew- Pink It may seem odd that my number one pick for 2007 is a song that was actually released in 2006, but Pink re-released the single in 07 after the success of U + UR Hand, her third single from the ‘I’m not Dead’ album. ‘Who Knew’ made it to # 9 on Billboard this past fall. I love everything about this song, the melody, the lyrics, the subtle and simple beat; this song captures all that you could ever want to say about or to a lost love. It’s one of those songs you hear and think, “I can really relate,” “Or I’ve been in that situation.” So, thanks Pink for packaging sentimental feelings so nicely and that’s why ‘Who Knew’ is my number 1 pick for 2007.


My Favorite Albums
12. Matchbox Twenty- Exile on Mainstream
11. Blake Lewis- Audio Day Dream
10. Duran Duran- Red Carpet Massacre
9. Timbaland- Shock Value
8. Joss Stone- Introducing Joss Stone
7. James Morrison- Undiscovered
6. Rihanna- Good Girl Gone Bad/ Maroon 5- It Won’t Be Soon Before Long
5. Annie Lennox- Songs of Mass Destruction
4. Carrie Underwood- Carnival Ride
3. Amy Winehouse – Back to Black
2. Alicia Keys- As I Am
1. Alice Smith- For Lovers, Dreamers, & Me
Each one of these albums is always on heavy rotation in my CD player or IPod. They are all different, better beats on some, better lyrics on others, but what makes them all my favorites; each of the album’s titles accurately defines the artist as they are presented, in other words the titles are effective and fitting metaphors, which seem to be hard to come by in pop music, today. Ok, let me explain. ‘Exile on Mainstream’ Matchbox Twenty’s latest album is a fitting title for a group that has produced some of the best mainstream pop songs of the 90s. In fact, ‘Exile’ is really a greatest hits album—including all their previous hits and six new songs. So to be exiled on mainstream, for me simply means the group is paying homage to the sound and era that made them popular, thus praising mainstream pop. ‘Audio Day Dream’ [refer to my review], but the short version, ADD seems to represent an aspect of Lewis’s personality, one in which an array of music swims through his head. Thus, an album of eclectic sounds is produced. ‘Red Carpet Massacre’ doesn’t that just sound like an eighties pop album title, this is not a bad thing; in fact it works well for Duran Duran. It effectively describes the iconic eighties pop group’s venture into contemporary music. I really do enjoy this album; I am just afraid the younger kids won’t listen because they might think the DD boys are not cool enough. But, with an updated sound they still make my list. ‘Shock Value’ gosh, again what more can I say. The album is a good mixture of styles; Timbaland probably shocked himself with his own greatness. Timbaland is defiantly the man of the hour; I just wonder if his hour will turn into a quick 15 minutes. A piece of advice, start turning artist down; keep you sound for a selected few. Look at some of the great producers whom came before you. They made their sound and mark with a few artists. ‘Introducing Joss Stone’ Introducing Joss, I didn’t need an introduction; her first album ‘The Soul Sessions’ made me an instant fan; the girl can sing-sang. But, the title is very fitting because we are introduced to a young female vocalist whose sound and lyrics matured so gracefully. She is a star on the rise, thus “introducing” her again to the world was very appropriate. If you haven’t heard of James Morrison, think Terence Trent D’Arby meets Johnny Lang meets Elliot Yamin. If that still doesn’t conjure any pictures of his voice, just go get the CD. It’s one of the best blue-eyed soul albums that I’ve heard in awhile. The title of his CD ‘Undiscovered’ is fitting because most people won’t recognize his name, in that sense he’s still undiscovered, but you make recognize and come to love his soulful raspy voice. And, if you are still skeptical, go download ‘Wonderful World’ and ‘You give Me Something.’ ‘Good Girl Gone Bad’- I can see why Rihanna opted for a title like this to describe her third CD, it is a break away from some of the more sugary sweet pop she produced on her first recordings, although the term ‘bad’ may be a stretch. Some of the songs, the first 5 do seem to represent a shift in her image. ‘it Won’t Be Soon Before Long,’ what the hell does that mean, right? Well, hopefully it’s a subtle message to their fans that it won’t be long before they get back to the kind of music they produced on their first record. Not to suggest that I didn’t like this album, I do; in fact, I love it; I just think ‘Songs about Jane’ was much better. ‘Songs of Mass Destruction’ isn’t this a sort of menacing title; I thought, why in the world would she describe her latest album in such a way? But, after listening to it for a while, I can see the destructive dark spots. Lennox is the kind of activist protest singer, the ones’ whom seem to feel obligated to use music to spread a political message. I don’t have a problem with that at all. I think there is a time and place for it and who better than Ms. Lennox. ‘Carnival Ride’ well, looking at Carrie Underwood’s career, it’s been a virtual carnival ride. Recently named the most successful idol—selling over 10 million records worldwide, I can’t think of a more fitting album title. ‘Back to Black,’ considering the soulful doo-wop sounds of most the album, ‘Back to Black seems to work well. She really evokes such a soulful feeling into each song, reminiscent of the Motown era. ‘As I Am’ Miss Keys really delivers on this CD. It does truly reflect who and what she is as an artist. And last, but certainly not least, my new favorite, ‘For Lovers, Dreamers, & Me’ I fell like she is such a muse within popular music and deserves number one status.

Janet's Back! With a little FEEBBACK

If you know me, then you know my favorite female vocalist is Janet Jackson. When I was a kid, my sister and I both were in love with the Jackson family. She was the Micheal fan and I was Janet's. I can remember placing all sorts of Janet posters on my wall. Gosh, memories...oh well, Janet is back, again and I hope this time she will hit the top of the the charts with her new single 'Feedback.' Unlike 'Just a little while' and 'Call on Me' her first singles from her last two Cd's 'Damita Jo' and '20 YO,' I think 'Feedback' maybe just the right combination of pop and r&b that her last two disk have lacked.
'Feedback' seems to be Janet's answer to the current 20 somethings pop frenzy. Artist like Ciara, Beyonce, Brittany(not so much anymore) Christina, and the occasional one-hit wonder like Cassie, making or leaving their mark on what's successful in the industry, artist such as Ms. Jackson have to copy their styles to really get any attention. what's ironic about that is it was female vocalist like Janet and Madonna whom inspired these girls. Go figure, right?
The single itself relies heavily on voice manipulation and the whole synthesized sound that is currently taking over the industry. Is this the best Janet? No! But, it will propel her career--placing her back inside the radar of teenagers--the driving force behind much of 'what is' and 'is not' popular in pop music--the MTV kids.
Janet's 10th studio album is set to drop in Late February. I for one can't wait.

New Music Reviews

BLAKE LEWIS- AUDIO DAY DREAM***

On the sixth season of American Idol, viewers were treated to an array of talented singers; the best A.I. could offer. Well, this could be a drastic overstatement, considering that last season’s ratings were some of the worst since idol debuted in 2001. But out the myriad of fame thirsty contestants, one may emerge to be a formidable force in the very fickle and ever-changing pop scene. Let me digress and take you back to a time when Prince and Michael Jackson battled for dominance on the pop charts. A time when other male recording artist seemed to all eschew at least on characteristic of these two singers, Jermaine Stewart, Morris Day, Zapp & Roger, El Debarge, Johnny Kemp, and the System all recorded music that was recognizably influenced by Prince and MJ’s style. Then it was hard to distinguish some of these artists, but Prince and MJ were completely different. There music was stylized; when a Michael Jackson song came on the radio, you knew it was Michael Jackson. Today, few artists have captured that stylized recognizable sound that these two artists did. Were they innovators, pioneers? In a sense, their music is synonymous with an entire decades sound [80s], but they were influenced by the sounds of James Brown and Jimi Hendrex, still they managed to create a sound all their own. Although today’s musicians seem to be relying more and more on sampling and paying homage to artists or musical concepts, some of the music is much in its own right eclectic.
Eclectic seems to be the most accurate term to really describe pop music today, or the best way to describe successful pop albums. Today, artist such as Fergie, Gwen Stefani, Kanye West, Ciara, etc…all try to mask their music behind a variety of styles and genres. Fergie’s The Duchtess album hosted an array of musical styles such as reggeton, 80s bubble gum pop, hip-hop, and R&B. The album did not have one defining feature and as a result became one of the best selling albums of 2006-2007. Now, I know what does this have to do with Blake Lewis? Well, Audio Day Dream is no different. It is an eclectic mix of 80s bubble gum pop mixed into a more contemporary sound.
Audio Day Dream reflects Lewis’s desire to create a sound that although isn’t uniquely original, but seems to praise the computerized synthesized music zeitgeist of the time. What I really like about this album is that there are really no surprises. How can this be a good thing? Well, Lewis doesn’t take any chances, which run the risk of not paying off. He sticks to what he knows—beat boxing and I for one, think it was a wise decision. On tracks such as ‘How Many Words’ and ‘What’cha Got 2 Lose’ he shows or better flaunts his vocal acrobats—and although there are not Christina Aguilera vocal tricks here, Lewis does manage to display his zeal for beat boxing. Unfortunately, there are some lulls on the disk; Lewis should stick to mid-tempo or fast pop songs. He doesn’t have the vocal maturity of Maroon 5’s Adam Levine or Idol predecessor’s Elliot Yamin and Chris Daughtry. The slower tracks such as ‘Without You’ or ‘End of the World’ are not horrible pop songs, but Lewis doesn’t have the ability to take these songs where they have the potential to go. Overall, this disk is fun, especially if you are an eighties buff; I think this disk is one you should check out. Download these- ‘Gots to Get Her,’ ‘How many Words,’ and ‘I Got U.’

ALICE SMITH, FOR LOVERS, DREAMERS, & ME*****

A week ago I discovered one of the most innovative and original artist to come along in quite awhile. Her name is Alice Smith, and her debut album entitled For Lovers, Dreamers, & Me has been in my CD player since I got it. This new chanteuse in the pop world is the best thing since I discovered how fabulous a drink mojitos were this summer. Actually, like the crisp, clean and sweet taste of a mojito, Smith’s album is just as refreshing. Really, that description probably doesn’t do the album justice, but if you know me, then you know I like to drink. So, comparing my favorite new album to a superb drink should come as no surprise. And, unlike so many of today’s female pop tart vocalist, Smith shines so brightly. Really, she is in a league all her own; she is the kind of artist I hope will have the kind of longevity women such as Aretha Franklin, Chaka Khan, Annie Lennox, Tina Turner, and even her self- proclaimed idol, Bjork. Smith has a unique and meticulous sound. She is the smooth, sensual, and seductive voice, reminiscent of eighties British soul diva Sade, but Smith’s voice commands your attention when she sings. Lyrically, this album is flawless. You will not find worn our clichés or overproduced tracks on For Lovers, Dreamers, & Me; instead you will a young artist’s life experiences shelled out in the visceral ten songs on the disk. She leaves her listener yearning for more. Don’t just download single tracks; go out and buy the entire album. If you like Amy Winehouse, then you’ll love Alice Smith. Download these- ‘New Religion,’ ‘Fake is the New Real,’ and ‘Love Endeav

Is Hip Hop Dead? A metaphor to carry voices

The history of hip-hop defines itself in a time when black youth demanded a place, a voice. Hip-hop, the music produced gave them that voice. Did artist like the Sugar Hill Gang, Kurtis Blow, Grand Master Flash, Run-DMC, Salt & Pepa and Mc Lyte make any political or social statements about black experiences? Yes! & No! In some instances a song such as ‘ Check Yo self’ did make a social statement about ‘ghetto’ life. Many artists’ work spoke directly to the diverse experiences of black youth disillusioned with a class system that from their perspectives, didn’t seem to offer them any real chances for social mobility.
As a child in the early eighties, I can remember the array of music my dad had stored in his wooden album cases. I grew up listening to music in many genres. Although I may not have some of the inner city experiences much of early hip-hip pioneers music encompassed, I did, and do relate to the some of the themes presented within it. For example, In the movie Breakin 1984, I can remember the words to the song ‘Ain’t no stopping us’ as clearly in my mind as if the song were popular today. My point here is to suggest that being tied to the experiences hip-hop artists tried to embed within their music is not a prerequisite for understanding or enjoying it.
Today, the idea that hip-hop is dead seems illogical. To say that hip-hop is dead is somewhat a misnomer or mis-leading because to die means something does not exist. Hip-hop exists because the ardor of hip-hop music is still alive. Hip-hop was [is] about having a voice. And within the many voices of hip-hop lives a passion and zeal to share often black experiences—to tell stories that may not otherwise get told. Some critics may disagree about the authenticity of the voices in today’s hip-hop music, or whether or not they are making as profound social and political statements as the pioneers within the genre. But I believe that is a different argument all together.
Essentially, like most music genres hip-hop is evolving. It has evolved. Like most and all things in pop culture, hip-hop now, is almost indistinguishable from mainstream pop music. Mainstream culture demands mutuality. Mutuality demands inclusion; it’s a party and everyone is invited, and everyone likes it. The more broad the audience, the more people to sell and thus buy a product, the more money, the artist and music industry executives make. The bottom line is profit, which is what trumps all in pop culture.
In 1998, Lauryn Hill , a former member of the hip-hop trio The Fugees released her ground-breaking album entitled The Mis-Education of Lauryn Hill. The title was play on the Carter G. Woodson book entitled The Mis-Education of the Negro. In it, Carter discusses ways in which African-Americans in the early part of the twentieth century were enslaved, not physically, but mentally. He challenged African-Americans to educate themselves out of the sort of back door mentality keeping so many confined to poverty and subjugation. I consider Hill’s 1998 release a novel venture into “real” hip-hop territory. Most of the albums overall message or themes centered on her experiences and worldview. For Hill, hip-hop represented story telling—it was her social and political narrative about ghetto life. The Mis-Education of Lauryn Hill album had meaning in a confusing world. Her release was a breath of fresh air in a sea of weak lyrics and empty messages. While female artist such as Lil Kim and Foxy Brown occupied stereotypical representations of black women, loose, lavish, and promiscuous, Hill’s record seemed to take a strong social stance against misogyny, sexism, and materialism. For example, in the first single That Thing Hill cautions young women and men to beware of Eurocentric ideals and values. The album itself is a sort of iconoclastic message against euro centrism, in which the content on many songs suggests Hill’s identity as an Afro centric thinker.
Although I did find Hill’s album too preachy in many instances, it was a an authentic voice in the evolution of hip-hop; she maneuvered through the ups and downs of life with rich lyrical ease. Unfortunately, today, much of hip-hop music seems empty—void of any real substance. But that is not to say it is dead. Hip-hop is alive and well; much of what is recognized as hip-hop music has been taken over by artist such as Lil Mamma, Chris Brown, Lil Jon, The Ying-Yang Twins, Ne-Yo, and a list of other mainstream artist whom are changing the landscape of hip-hop music. Hip-Hop has evolved, but the zeal to record music that speaks to a particular group is still represented. Ben Harper, Lil Wayne, 50 cent, Fat Joe, Kanye West, Nas, Common, Jay-Z, Kevin Micheals, and Leela James are all pioneers in this new evolution. Their music combines some of the classical ideas of hip-hop with a more contemporary sound.

Britney Spears, ‘The Blackout’ A Laudatory Review

About two months ago, I discussed that week’s recent Britney Spears’ antics with a good friend of mine. We both agreed; she was [is] a complete dumb ass. I know pretty harsh words, but we both agreed she was becoming more and more vexing. Okay, you may be wondering why we even care. Well, I think we began to wonder, too. Let’s see; was it her amazing singing voice? No! I guess we just thought, “She is a good entertainer.” Yeah, but so are a lot of strippers, too. Well, at least the patrons who frequent strip joints would probably agree that their entertained. Essentially, we both thought she was throwing away her career. We were disappointed. Of course, she did not renew our confidence with that pitiful VMA performance, just tragic. To put it plainly, “we didn’t expect much from her next supposed comeback album.” I said, “This album will fail; it will be a flop; Britney’s career is over.” Well her career may fail, but it won’t be because of ‘The Blackout.’ In fact, ‘The Blackout’ is a lot better than I expected. Nonetheless, it did take a few spins in my CD player, before I thought, “you know this is not that bad; in fact it’s produced really well.” What do I like about ‘The Blackout?’ The sound, it has great beats that make you want to jump on the nearest stripper pole. No, actually I think the sound is catchy, it makes you want to move [dance] it's electric--yes, you will want to boogie woogie. This is a pure quintessential dance album. It is nowhere near Madonna's 2005 hit 'Confessions on a Dance Floor,' but it's a close second. 'The Blackout' is my newest guilty pleasure, and trust, I have plenty. It’s also pure raunch, too. It is girls gone wild meets Jenna Jamison porn. If you can get past Britney’s tone deaf voice as she breathes and whispers over every track, then you may be able to enjoy this album. Download these; ‘Get Naked,’ ‘Radar,’ ‘ooh ooh Baby,’ and ‘Break the Ice,’ I don’t think you will be disappointed.

Fall Music Preview: Four More DIVAS

Annie Lennox: Songs of Mass Destruction ****
With this follow-up to 2003’s Bare, Songs of Mass Destruction, Lennox’s new album does not disappoint. The lyrical chanteuse returns with a vivacious album that is both innovative and empowering. Lennox follows in the vein of her Eurhythmics sound on tracks such as ‘Ghost in my Machine’ and ‘Big Sky’ (my personal favorite). But, it is on the standout feminist driven tracks ‘Womankind’ and ‘Sing’ where Lennox’s voice really shines. ‘Sing’ is a wonderful track dedicated to increasing awareness about global sisterhood. ‘Sing’ boast an array of female vocalist, it is a sort of “who’s who” in pop music, everyone from Madonna to Joss Stone, and Celine Dion, literally sing on this track. This is one of the most uplifting and powerful tracks to hit the music scene. Will it be a single? I hope, but probably not. There are stronger more radio friendly tracks on Destruction. Download these: ‘Love is Blind,’ ‘Smithereens,’ and ‘Big Sky.’

Carrie Underwood: Carnival Ride ****
On her sophomore effort Carrie SOARS. Carnival Ride is an infectious album. If you are not a country music fan, don’t worry this album packs a punch; it has something for everyone. A little pop, a little country, and dare I say, even a little rhythm and blues. The lead song, ‘Flat on the Floor’ is an up tempo song with fierce, that’s right fierce lyrics. Carrie displays that “in-your-face” attitude she had on the hugely successful ‘Before he Cheats’ record. ‘Flat on the Floor’ is a great song to kick off the album. It’s seems to take her out of her element; you know the sort soft safe ballads one might expect from the American Idol alumni. Other notable tracks include, ‘All-American Girl,’ ‘Just a Dream,’ ‘Crazy Dreams,’ and of course the final track, which is a metaphor for the album title ‘Wheel of the World.’ I predict even greater success for Carrie on this album than her debut ‘Some Hearts.’ Underwood’s voice shows more maturity and growth. Unlike Kelly Clarkson’s latest effort, ‘My December,’ Underwood does not take as many risks musically, but the one’s she does take seem to pay off. Download these: ‘Last Name,’ ‘I know you Won’t,’ and ‘Crazy Dreams,’


Jennifer Lopez: Brave **1/2
On her first two albums, Lopez crafted pure “pop” bliss. The songs were a mesh of Latin salsa, pop, and r&b. The albums On the 6 circa 1998 & JLO circa 2001 reflected a fun, energetic, lively sound. She created music that was exciting. Remember the dance sequences in ‘If you had my Love’ and ‘Love don’t Cost a Thing’ this was pop at its best. Unfortunately, Lopez has not been able to recapture that same feel on her last two albums and on her latest effort, ‘Brave’ she seems to fall short once again. Where is the “MOJO” JLO? ‘Brave’ is another sub-par album, although I do like the sort of eighties vibe, all some songs seem to really lack that fire or spark to ignite enough interest. The lead single, ‘Do it Well’ boast a great beat, but vocally Lopez sounds rushed and a little uncomfortable. “Rushed” is a great way to describe this album. Not a single track is “brave” as the title would suggest. Lopez work has become very generic and boring. Although her first two albums were not perfection, many of the songs had great hooks and break beats. Maybe she needs to recruit Diddy again, he was obviously doing something for her sound that subsequent producers since, have not been able to capture. Mediocre songs won’t cut it in this day an age of here today gone tomorrow, especially if you don’t have the vocals. Download these: ‘Do it Well,’ ‘Stay Together,’ and ‘The way it is.’


Chaka Khan: Funk This ***
If you remember “funk” music, then this is the album for you. If you are a Chaka Khan fan, then this is the album for you. If you love divas, “real” divas, then this is the album for you. On ‘Funk This,’ Chaka brings back the old-school funk sound of the 70s on tracks such as ‘Back in the Day,’ and ‘ ‘Foolish Fool.’ Once I discovered Chaka’s work with the funk band Rufus, I was instantly hooked on her voice. It is so rich and powerful. I don’t believe any other female artist can take songs to such massive heights as Chaka. She is on in a million. ‘Funk This’ is a return to creating the Rufus and Chaka Khan sound. Download these: ‘Disrespectful,’ ‘Sign ‘O’ the Times,’ ‘Back in the Day,’ and ‘Hail to the Wrong.’

Walk the Line: Barack Obama’s Slippery Slope

Obama’s statement in response to appeals that he abstains from his commitment to participate a political function with Grammy award winning Reverend Donnie McClurkin:

"I have clearly stated my belief that gays and lesbians are our brothers and sisters and should be provided the respect, dignity, and rights of all other citizens. I have consistently spoken directly to African-American religious leaders about the need to overcome the homophobia that persists in some parts of our community so that we can confront issues like HIV/AIDS and broaden the reach of equal rights in this country. I strongly believe that African Americans and the LGBT community must stand together in the fight for equal rights. And so I strongly disagree with Reverend McClurkin's views and will continue to fight for these rights as President of the United States to ensure that America is a country that spreads tolerance instead of division."

What Obama lacks in judgment, he seems to make up in eloquence. His statement is very powerful. As a gay man, I would love to support a candidate whom will fight for the rights and privileges all Americans are bestowed. I do believe Obama has good intentions for the LGBT community. In his book, The Audacity to Hope, he makes some compelling arguments for gay marriage rights and defining the institution in general. When I read about his association with Reverend McClurkin, I was dismayed. I am familiar with McClurkin’s autobiography—he believes in the sort of “ex-gay” transitions that so many gay and lesbian people fall victim. These people, their organization prays, literally on people’s insecurities—making them believe a relationship with “GOD” is only possible and accessible if they change “who” and “what” they are in this world. That being said, I am all for an open dialogue with people whom disagree. As a politician, Obama has to be able to dialogue with people that will often hold fanatical beliefs. In order to be a man of the people, he has to be willing to meet and greet with those who hold all kinds of views. But, and this is a big BUT, he must defend his views and support what he claims to support. So, if you are for inclusion and protecting every citizen’s rights in this country, then you cannot sweep under the rug your position on issues that are brought to the table. Reverend McClurkin’s public persona and reputation as an “Ex-Gay” automatically bring the issue to the table.

Benjamin DeMott’s The Trouble with Friendship: Why Most Americans can’t think straight about race

The Trouble with Friendship has for me, since I put the book down almost twenty-four hours ago, been one of the most compelling and insightful books I have read in years. This is a noteworthy statement; many, many, many of the books I have read in the past five years have been “academic” in nature. Most dealing with cultural topics such as race, sexuality, and gender, the three topics I am most interested. Let me back track for a minute, and consider the idea of “thinking clearly” what does it mean? I teach freshman composition and one of the claims of my department is that we teach our students how to “think clearly” in order to write clearly. This concept is anything new or earth shattering, but the most students don’t. So, getting back to DeMott’s work, what does “thinking clearly” have to do with his book. Well, for the most part he presupposes that in America, there is a distinct problem with “friendship” [black, white, and brown] which is why “we” as a collective nation cannot think straight or “clearly” about it.
“Why can’t we all get along” are the words that run through my mind. Of course, if we buy into everything popular culture tells us about ourselves, we in fact do get along. This idea of “getting along” or that we are all the “same” is at the heart of DeMott’s work. The friendship orthodoxy as he terms it, tells us that we are all the same, we have the same values and beliefs. We are essentially a people with the spirit of “can do.” But for African-Americans, simply given our history in this country, DeMott paints a very different picture than the one “pop culture” tries to sell.
What he has created is a methphorical testament about racial troubles in American society. He has given a voice to concerns that I feel, have gone astray in the past twenty years. I really believe if we look at films and television as a sort of cultural text, then we can really “see” DeMott’s ideas come to life. For example, I discussed in my graduate thesis the ways in which African-Americans, specifically women are depicted on television and film. I asserted the idea that authenticity rest in the realm of multiplicity. Many of the depictions of Black women I observed relied on convention and stereotype to rely or to create a sense of authentic “Blackness” for the viewer. In terms of DeMott’s work, this is classic pop culture; informing much of what the general public believes about social groups. Friendship orthodoxy becomes a narrative text in movies and on television because the mediums are seemingly telling a story about American experiences. The stories in films like White Men Can’t Jump or Six degrees of Separation often paint a misleading picture of racial integration.
A film, that I believe would appeal to DeMott’s taste is Crash. The film won the Oscar for Best Picture in 2005, although it was not favored to win in this category. The film is a metaphor for many of the complex and complicated racial tensions still present in American culture. A lot of the backlash surrounding this film was in-part because it did not really fit into the friendship orthodoxy theme. Unlike, many movies dealing with racial tensions, Crash painted a very unapologetic picture of life in Los Angeles, California. It did not make us feel good. In fact, it was a wake-up call---shouting, “things are not okay, we don’t all get along, in fact, we may not really like each other.” A film like Crash is important because it is brutally honest. Unfortunately, honesty is often hard to find in popular culture.
Friendship is intelligent, prophetic, and realistic about the racial and social problems that continue to plague our country. We can choose to keep our heads buried in the sand, or we can choose to educate ourselves. I choose to educate.

Visit this address for an interview with DeMott
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/race_relations/race_matters_1-15.html

JENA 6: NO VERACITY INTENDED

Racial disputes,violence, teenagers, a town divided all seem to be the parts for a great cinematic feature; yet, all these characteristics are not subplots for a movie. Instead they are real-life sequences from the now, very popular Jena 6 case in Jena, Louisiana. I must admit, I heard about this case in snippets. First, about two-weeks ago, on The Bill Maher Show, Harvard Professor Cornel West and Rapper, Actor, and Activist Mos Def both commented on the incident in Jena. Of course, their rantings were, now I see, but at the time I didn't, really biased. But, "race" I will agree with some of their sentiments race was, and still is an issue in this case. They reported that six African-American teenagers were being charged with attempted murder. While the white children involved were virtually receiving no punishment at all. This was the basic gist. Now, this past week I have heard even more about the case and like many I immediately formed an opinion, without really knowing all the facts. Our news media seem to thrive on sensationalizing every "news" story--forgetting to tell the story accurately. But, not to digress, something seemed off. I felt like I was not getting all the facts; there was something missing from the accounts I had heard on radio and television. I decided to do some investigating of my own, and found an article that seed to shed some light in many dark spots of this story. Visit this address for a full account of the Jena 6 story. http://news.aol.com/story/_a/black-and-white-becomes-gray-in-la-town/n20070922140809990002 After I read this reporter's account, I have come to "see" the events in Jena somewhat differently. Although I do believe the boys [Jena 6] are being treated unfairly, and in part it could really be racially motivated, I cannot in good faith, rally behind leaders such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson who will use and exploit this event for their own professional gain. Let's consider keeping this incident in the context of the community in which it happened. For example, according to the report, eye witnesses describe kids of both races playing with the nooses, pretending to hang themselves. Also, African-Americans jurors picked randomly for jury selection did not show up. The white boys responsible for the nooses were suspended for a longer time than what's being reported. All the African-American children involved were not "good" students, one was on probation. Basically, there is a lot of misinformation in circulation--leading people to make hasty judgements about what should be done. This most surely is a time for both Black and White to come together across the lines and forge new relationships--it is a time to educate getting past and getting over our differences.

BRITNEY BOMBS! MTV VMA PERFORMANCE

Wow! Where do I begin? Was it the slightly over done shades of blue mix blond extensions? Was it the horrible lip synching and not singing at all? Was it the blank stare into the camera, "am I really here"or "I'm quite nervous; I've never done this before" stares? Or was it the scantily clad stripper outfits? Hm.... I can't really pinpoint one thing. But, I'll tell you what it wasn't, a great ground shaking comeback performance. Britney, Britney, Britney, this is yet another embarrassing showing, in a string of "what the fuck" moments in your post babies career. Expectations were high; your fellow musician and fans were pulling for you Brit. But you Bombed, and not just bad, but really, really, really like stink, stank, stunk BAD. Ugh....I feel "A letter to Britney" coming on.

Feeling PINK!

"Who Knew" is the very appropriate title of pop singer Pink's latest single to climb the charts. You remember Pink; the late nineties ultimate bad-ass pop diva circa "There You Go," "Most Girls," and "You make me Sick," all were chart toppers in there own right. Now, in 2007 Pink is finally getting the much deserved attention her 2006 album "I'm Not Dead" didn't really receive. In fact, the single "Who knew" was released last summer as the follow-up to "Stupid Girls." Now, the single is quickly climbing the Billboard Hot 100 single's chart. In part, Pink can probably contribute her re-entry into pop martyrdom because of Justin Timberlakes world tour this past year. She was his opening act. In addition, the club favorite "U and Ur hand" helped bring some much needed attention to her fourth studio album. I, for one am very excited for Pink, "I'm Not Dead" is a great album. The vocals are arguably the best I have ever heard her deliver. They are so rich and authentic on tracks such as "Who Knew, Nobody Knows, and The one that Got away." Of course, the standout track is the politically poignant "Dear Mr. President." This track could be a model for pop artist making political statements through their music. If you haven't heard "I'm not Dead" go out and get it right now.

MTV's 22 Greatest Voices in Music

I was doing a quick wikapedia search the other day and came across the following list. It is MTV's list of the twenty-two greatest singers in contemporary pop music.

They are ranked from 1-22; one, of course being the best voice. Mariah Carey is ranked number 1 and Bruce Springsteen is ranked number 22.

Greatest Voices in Music is a countdown of the greatest singers in contemporary music, by MTV and Blender Magazine.

Mariah Carey
Freddie Mercury
Whitney Houston
Bono (U2)
Christina Aguilera
Alanis Morissette
Kurt Cobain
Björk
Celine Dion
Tupac Shakur
Michael Jackson
Chris Cornell
Eminem
David Bowie
Alicia Keys
Steven Tyler
Jewel
Thom Yorke
Mary J. Blige
Michael Stipe
Sade Adu (Lead singer of Sade (band))
Bruce Springsteen

What do you think? Definitely some great singers on the list, but also some questionable ones, too. Well, let the debate begin.

This is all so rhetorical. The greatest voices in pop music, but based on what standard? Are we talking about vocal, actual singing ability; or are we talking about people whom use their voices to make profound statements in pop music. If we take the first definition, what the hell is Eminem or Tupac doing on the list. I like rap music, and I especially like Tupac, but you can't rank him among the greatest voices if you list a singer's vocal ability as deciding factor. Neither Tupack nor Eminem are singers. They rap. Rap has its' on set of criteria. Have they both used their music to awaken the public to some of the harsh realities of urban life? Yes! They both are great "voices" in pop music in terms of their lyrical content.

Nonetheless, the list is very diverse and eclectic, which I like. Although some of the artist on it are questionable. I don't know if I believe Mariah Carey to be a better vocalist than Whitney Houston or Chrisitna Aguilera, but that is just my opinion. Also, Micheal Jackson is the only Black male, aside from Tupac on the list. Don't get me wrong, I like Mike's music, but I could name about oh five other male vocalist who would put his voice to shame. Luther Vandross, Donny Hathaway, Marvin Gaye, James Ingram, Billy Ocean, and James Brown, just to name a few. Or what about my blue-eyed soul brothers like Micheal McDonald, Justin Timberlake, and Steely Dan. What about Patti Labelle, Aretha Franklin, Annie Lennox, Bette Midler, Anita Baker, Diana Ross, Cindy Lauper, Etta James and Tina Turner. Actually, the more I think about, the more I realize this list is kind of like a bad joke. Hmm...Let's all laugh and really think about the 22 greatest voices in contemporary pop music.

Black Folks and McDonald's

What is it about McDonald's and Black folks? Before I begin I should backtrack, this blog is not a critique about representation perse. I know African Americans in this country has struggled for years and years for a place, a voice, and positive images in mainstream media. So, we can all probably agree that Black folks have media representation to a certain degree. My problem really begins with the ways in which we [as a community of people who share the same skin color] are portrayed.

I live in the south; I am sure the television commercials I see are geared toward a southern demographic. Therefore I should expect to see commercials that [advertisers believe based on qualitative research] are intended for communities in which they can sell their products. Having established that, I am still somewhat miffed at the abundance of fast food commercials, especially McDonald's commercials that depict Blacks enjoying this unhealthy _ _ _ _. Now, I am not trying to begin a fallacious argument here, I completely understand that my inquiries could be perceived as generalizations. Nonetheless, as a personal trainer and fitness junkie, I can't help but wonder if advertisers themselves are not relying on a the false assumption that Blacks are not very food conscious. I'll be honest there is a need in the African American community for greater health and fitness awareness in terms of our diets. For example, high blood pressure is a lot more common among African Americans.

I guess what really irritates me is that these commercials seem so culturally biased, almost as if McDonald's is floridly catering to one specific group, simply because they believe this group is not very well informed about their products. It all smells really disingenuous; and I know I have used that word in several blogs, but sometimes it is so appropriate. Maybe I am reading too much into it; am I over analyzing here? What do you think?

Music Review: Ms. Kelly, Kelly Rowland

Before I really critique this album, I think it is pertinent to sort of draw a clear description for what I like in a CD. In fact, it's not enough to just say, "oh that CD is great or good." I need to make concrete what I look for in "good" pop music. Of course, I'm am easy to please, my taste are very eclectic, but I tend to be a little harder on artist, whom I feel have the goods, but can't seem to deliver; I'm afraid that is where Ms. Kelly finds itself.

First, I hate monotony; I love diversity. I love when an artist plays with various sounds, but still manages to stick to a solid theme for the disc. Case in point, Christina Aguilera's last album, Back to Basics, it was brilliant. Her concept for the album from start to finish is very apparent. She was very meticulous lyrically, vocally, and musically.

Ms. Kelly, unfortunately is not the album it could be. It starts with the fun sort of playful sound of 'Like this' and keeps the same groove with the next track 'Comeback'. Yet, towards the middle the sound and intensity of the album seem to fade. Basically you'll get bored with Ms. Kelly real quick. The disk lacks diversity both musically and vocally. Kelly seems to hold back on many of the slower tracks, ones in which her soaring soprano should shine. Tracks like 'Every thought is You' and 'The Show' leave little to be desired. The bright spots on this disc appear toward the end with 'Still in love with my Ex' and 'Love' both tracks seem the most authentic, ones in which Kelly truly speaks from the heart. With such a sassy in your face title as Ms. Kelly, one would think that each track is going to show Ms. Rowland in a whole new light, contrasted with her DC image. Consequently, she doesn't seem to deliver what the title promises. This is not the self-actualizing and defining album she needed. I guess, I'll end with the words of a young diva, gone too soon, Kelly "dust yourself off and try again."

Download- Comeback, Still in love with my Ex, Flashback, and Love.

Beyonce "Roboho" or Sharpton "Mediawhore"?

Bootilicious Diva Beyonce Knowles finds herself, or better put, her wardrobe in somewhat of a controversy; the starlet's recent BET Awards performance has sparked some media attention due to supposed racist comments made about her performance outfit. Editors on TMZ.com called the robocop outfit a roboho costume. Now, Al Sharpton has come to her defense claiming the comments were racist and derogatory to women. Although I can to a certain degree concur with Sharton's sentiments, I do not believe the writers at TMZ were making a conscious effort to demean women, or Miss Knowles herself. According to Sharton,"Calling any woman a "ho" is demeaning and abusive and it should not be tolerated on any level. It is intolerable to think that TMZ.com would find humor in calling Beyonce -- someone who symbolizes the strength, dignity and uplifting of Black women [are you serious!] -- a "Roboho," and they should be denounced by the entire community for glorifying the continued oppression of women with this derogatory term. Racism in America is perpetuated by ignorance and hate and using one's airwaves or media entity to promote it is a blatant setback to civil rights and the advancement of equality."

Of course, I can agree; there are derogatory words in our society that are used with malicious intent to harm and degrade people in our society, whether the intended group is apart of a minority culture is irrelevant to some degree. Yes, Mr. Sharpton racism in America is perpetuated by ignorance and hate, but educating people about racism and it's pervasive effects on a progressive society, such as the United States [ or at least I'd like to think so] is the key, not censorship. I would like to think you are interested in seeing an America that is motivated to love and respect differences in our culture as apart of the social fabric that holds us together. Nonetheless, when you live in a democracy, a place in which free-speech is protected as a right in the Constitution, you have to have the impediment to protect it. Mr. Sharpton I don't believe you do. As a social activist, I believe it is your duty to call attention to crisis in our society that really seek to demean women, men, children, anyone. If you truly believe in equality for all Americans then stop pandering to a false belief that every word out of someones mouth should tow some political line. Yes, I do believe people whom have a voice in mainstream media have a responsibility to speak with intelligence and respect, but let's be honest; free speech is often hateful; it's a part of what makes our nation great. You and I both have the right to express our opinions. But, when you degrade or disrespect people, you will have to pay the consequences for your actions. Yes, call attention to the way women are portrayed in the media. Inform people about the double standard performing artist face in a male driven industry. Let's get to the root of the problem; don't gloss over the real issues by using a comment made about an outfit to advance your own agenda, whatever that may be [you're sort of all over the place Mr. Sharpton]. Why do women in the pop music industry especially, feel the need to sell their bodies as a way to sell their music? Why do we accept Rap artist calling women "hos" and "bitches' and don't speak out against the blatant misogyny embedded within the music? Women are not objects, but when artist such as Beyonce and Britney parade around in their own videos as if they are; how can you condemn someone for calling them a name that seems to represent the behavior? Maybe this is where you should begin. Finally, Mr. Sharton you do not seem to know a lot about Ms. Knowles career in the music industry, which speaks to the disingenuous nature of your remarks. Check out her past two albums, Dangerously in Love and B-Day. On the first album, the song entitled 'Naughty Girl,' Beyonce boast about being some guy's naughty girl. On her second disc, she has a song called 'Freakum Dress.' Now, what self-respecting, strong, dignified, and uplifting Black woman lauds about being freaky in bed and wearing her freakum dress to clubs? Hm mm....I don't know many. Yes, Beyonce is very popular and I'm sure many young girls admire and look up to her. But, she is not necessarily, given the many sexualized images she invokes, the woman you claim you're defending. Similarly, I am not saying women cannot be sexy and dignified; I do believe together they are hard to project.

Missed the Mark....My Favorite Female Recording Artist

This past Tuesday Kelly Clarkson released her third studio album. Although the cd has not been welcomed with rave reviews, I offer Kelly this blog topic as a reminder that even the most iconic female singers have had a stumble or two in their careers. Kelly, if this album is not the commercial success that you hoped; don't worry; you are simply following in the footsteps of many female recording artist who have fallen victim to the artistically great album, but not too well received publicly. Case in point, Janet Jackson, Madonna, and Mariah Carey, the albums were 2004's Damita Jo, 1992's Erotica, and 2001's Glitter. Lyrically, I think these albums are great; some the production maybe questionable, but I believe these three albums really capture the true character and vulnerabilities vocally of each artist. Unfortunately, circumstance clouded the public's response to each one of these albums. First, in 1993 Madonna released her infamous SEX book. The book was so over the top and lude that it recieved a lot of negative public attention. Consequently her album sales suffered as a result the the backlash to SEX. Given the time frame the album was released, it was probably Madonna's most ardent statement about feminine sexual power. Take these lyrics for example, "Once you put your hand in the flame You can never be the sameThere's a certain satisfaction In a little bit of pain I can see you understand I can tell that you're the same If you're afraid, well rise above I only hurt the ones I love." Like so many female recording artist today, Madonna is placing herself in the driver's seat. She is in control of her sexual wants and desires, not men. Another notable, but widely overlooked track on this album was the song 'Why's it so Hard'. Here we see Madonna giving the world her insights on racism. For example, "What do I have to do to be accepted/What do I have to say/What do I have to do to be respected/How do I have to play/What do I have to look like to feel I'm equal/Where do I have to go/What club do I have to join to prove I'm worthy/Who do I have to know/[Chorus:]I'm telling you brothers, sisters/Why can't we learn to challenge the system/Without living in pain/Brothers, sisters/Why can't we learn to accept that we're different/Before it's too late /Why's it so damn hard / I believe this songs is one of Madonna's best. She makes a poignant and especially relevant political and social statement. In 1992 the exigence for a song such as this one was so needed, given the outcome of the Rodney King Trial, affirmative action cases were taking national precedent, and it was an election year. So, this song came at a time when [we] as Americans were questioning our social institutions, seemingly the fabric that holds us together.

Secondly in 2001, we witnessed a very public Mariah Carey breakdown as she lost a few of her marbles due to overwork and stress. Or at least that is what her publicist would like us [her adoring fans] to believe. Once again the album was great, classic 80s sound, especially when the 80's throwback sound was so popular. Yet, Mariah's venture into 80sdom was not well received. Her public meltdown, in part may have been a consequence of her movie, Glitter's, poor, poor reviews and her bizarre public antics contributed to this albums downfall. Once again, great album, but bad timing. Lyrically the album was not a departure from Maria's typical song arrangements. Her songs usually build to an explosive ending. If that was not a good description, consider these songs from some of her previous work, 'Vision of love, Love takes time, Can't Let Go, Without You, One Sweet Day, Butterfly, My All, and Can't take that Away,' they all have the same melodic sound that intensifies until Mariah hits that glass breaking high note.

Finally, we can't forget Nipplegate. Yes, it was this monumental moment in Superbowl history that re-shaped Janet Jackson's career. Three years ago Janet or should I say Justin revealed Janet's nipple to the world. In the mist of all the Nipplegate controversy, Janet decided it would be a great time to release her next studio album entitled Damita Jo. Hmm...not such a good idea Janet, although the album was good, it didn't get the attention it deserved. Notable tracks include, 'Spending Time with You,' 'Island Life,' 'I Want You,' and 'R&B Junkie'. What was so great about this album is that it was pure Janet. She has always been able to infuse a nice mixture of really pop and r&b into her music. This album was not making any political or social statements like Rhythm Nation, or revealing any personal turmoil like The Velvet Rope, but I do believe it captures Janet's sensual, fun, and passionate side quite well. Unfortunately, Nipplegate overshadowed any potential this album may have had.

Well, Kelly don't fret. If My December doesn't perform as you might have expected, then just remember; the women before you have bounced back from poor album sales and so can you.

Ann Coulter, 2007's Grendel Award Winner

In keeping with the current theme established in the Paris Hilton blog, I must return and try to decipher the irrelevancies of yet another blonde five letter word. Yes, it seems that the she's at it again, that vile, despicable, monster-who likes to call herself Ann Coulter is rearing it's ugly head again. I know; such harsh language, and I am afraid that it still may not be enough to truly capture the essence and lack of character Coulter displays in most interviews and her very desperate ventures into political commentary. In a recent interview on the news program HARDBALL, Coulter received a phone call from Mrs. Edwards, presidential nominee John Edwards wife. She [Mrs. Edwards] candidly requested that Coulter stop making personal attacks against John Edwards and other political candidates. She said "if you want to discuss issues and debate, that is fine, but please refrain from personal attacks." Hmmm...seems like a reasonable request. Seems like the kind of discourse two intelligent people should be able to engage. However, we must remember whom we're dealing with- Ann Coulter. I don't believe she could even begin to know the meaning of the word reasonable. She lives for personal attacks. Everything she writes is an attack. I think she might believe she is very caustic in her delivery. Well, Miss Coulter since you are so fond of fallacious argument tatics-what do you think of mine? You are a the most nasty, venomous, repugnant, being-comparable even to Grendel in the Beowulf tales. In fact I believe you are Grendel, the most loathsome and lowest creature. I support Mrs. Edwards as Beowulf and you are the disgusting Grendel. And, I believe most people know how that battle ended. Oh yeah, get rid of that freaking out-dated cocktail dress. Your attempts to be sexy are about is ridiculous and unnecessary as your political comments.

PARIS HILTON....Who gives a $*%@

Before I begin this post, I must admit that I am giving lip service to the very thing I am about to complain, rant, even bitch about. But, I feel a calling; and maybe some unsuspecting tall blonde will stumble upon my meager blog and have a revelation. Something along these lines is preferable, I am not relevant; I am not important; I have no talent; I must go away....far, far, far away. Oh well, I can dream, right? After a long day of training, yard work, and general housework, I sit down and turn on the television. Hmmm....what station? As I channel surf, I end up on my favorite local station, Channel 10 CBS. Not because they have great programming, but I am a soap opera fan and CBS has the best. Young and the Restless rocks! Okay, back to my rant, it's 6:30 and EXTRA is showing something about Paula Abdul's new reality series. Are they serious? Paula Abdul, a new series, okay that could be a blog to itself. But, I am quickly remember I am sort of a Paula fan, so I keep watching. Next, in there highlights for tomorrow's show. ..."PARIS HILTON, her first interview, what she has to say, etc....." What the $*%@ people? Why, why, why do so many people care about Paris Hilton? Is it her amazing talent? Is it her striking beauty? Is it her quirky catch phrases, "That's Hot!" To be quite honest, and I will take a favorite quote from a friend, she is about as relevant as a bear shitting in the woods. Her success as a pop culture icon, and I use that term very loosely; is quite the enigma. I would love to think of her post prison attention as more of "oh Paris we're laughing at you not with you." Yet, I know she is going to milk this attention for all it's worth and sadly, the mainstream media, will eat it up. I realize we live in somewhat trying times, we are fighting a war, and yes, I can admit; we need distractions. But, Paris Hilton is not a distraction; she's not even interesting. So, on that note I have to end this blog.

Music Picks: Rihanna & Amy Winehouse

As promised, more comments on Rihanna new Cd, Good Girl Gone Bad, and I have to say this one is pure pop bliss. There is some definite growth on this record both lyrically and vocally. Rihanna takes some risks-trying to shed that "good girl" image of the past two years. However, I don't really think the "SOS" video was 'good girl' or "Unfaithful" (a cheating girlfriend) but if she's claiming 'bad girl' status now, more power to you. Okay back to her current cd, I am in love with it. Most of the songs don't require two or three listening before you are hooked. Download - "Don't stop the Music" it will leave you wanting more, more, more...

Last week I discovered Amy Winehouse's first UK release entitled "Frank" and let me just say that it is just as good, if not better than her current US release "Back to Black". Despite what critics may say about her personal blunders, she has such a distinctive sound. Her first release is not as 60's sounding as "Back to Black" it has a more current feel to it. Amy's signature bombastic, raw, in-your-face lyrics are just as poignant as they are on "Back to Black." Download - "Fuck Me Pumps" and "Stronger than Me"

Foment My Soul; Senator Clinton Speaks

Saturday night I had the pleasure to attend a Bush Bashing event. No.. actually it was not all Bush Bashing, it was a Democratic Fundraiser for Presidential hopeful Hilary Clinton. The event was held in Alltell Arena with about 4,000 plus attending. It felt good being around people who supposedly share the same beliefs or vision for our country. I felt great in fact, but I think there was something lacking. Where was the synergy? The crowd seemed very relaxed and even bored at times. I am a native Arkansan; I know we can get excited. Just attend any Razorback football game and you'll see Arkansans show their spirit. Our congressional Representatives and Governor Mike Beebe all were supposed to get the crowed pumped, primed, and ready for Mrs. Clinton. For the most part they did; they each had wonderful things to say about her and their remarks got sufficient responses(cheers and claps) but no pig..soooiee from the crowd. So, what am I getting at here? Well with such a build up, did Clinton deliver? Although I support Hilary and believe she wants to make some significant real needed changes in this country, I can't say that her speech was energizing or inspiring, maybe even forgetful. Okay so lets backup for a second; if I make a claim, I should support it with reason. In the continuing evolution of political candidates, and yes folks evolution does occur, it is not good enough to have an impeccable resume filled with experience and credentials. Of course, those things make a difference, we can see that qualified should really mean "qualified." We have the Bush administration to thank for giving us unqualified people, thus we never want to retreat to placing people in positions because of certain loyalties. Nonetheless, a political candidate and especially a Presidential hopeful, has to be able to sell them self. They are applying for a job, undoubtedly the most important job in our nation. So, what does that mean? First it means they have to inspire people. Political candidates have to make people believe in their convictions. Second, and this goes for so much in life, but really is important for public speaking and writing-know your audience. Political candidates have to know the audience's needs, wants, and desires. On a general level, most politicians know this, but what makes for great speeches, good public oratory is inundated with audience awareness. Critics may say that could get candidates in trouble; they could be said to be flip flopper's or double talkers. Yet, I think the more aware of your audience you are, the better informed your speech will be, and you will not make mistakes such as double talk. It does not mean you are disingenuous, it just means you are not taking you supporters needs for granted. Finally, Senator Clinton's speech was brief; she did hit all the major talking points, but I am compelled to say it lacked the charisma and ardor it really needed.

If I had to grade her speech, and essentially that is what I am doing; I give her a C+/B-. I was good, but could have been better (more Bush Bashing), she did make her positions clear, or as clear as any politician will at this point in the race. I think there were some missed ceremonial opportunities to get the crowed fired up. Once you tap into people's emotion you have really got them sold.

Massachusetts has Big Balls

Thanks, a many thanks to the activist, citizens, and general supporters who helped law makers defeat a challenge by social conservatives in Massachusetts to ban same-sex marriage. Massachusetts is the only state to legalize same-sex unions. I for one would love to see the rest of America hop on the bandwagon and follow in their footsteps. I can dream; right? If you can't tell from most of my blogs, I am liberal; in fact very liberal. But, I hate labels- I prefer to think of myself as a reasonable, fair-minded person, who can see both sides of controversial issues. Consequently, the liberal perspectives seem to always be the most intelligent. Okay, on to this gay marriage issue.

Social conservatives basically want the monopoly on who can get married. Well that's great; the last time I checked, we have a government in this country. And, "we the people" means a collective group of people who give their consent to be governed by elected officials. These Representatives make decisions which meet the best interest of those people. It's called a representative democracy. Likewise social conservatives might agree with this sentiment-feeling a vote on gay marriage should be left up to the citizens of each state. One problem, marriage in this country is not just a religious union, it is also a legally binding one. In deed, it was our founding father's major concern and hope the religion and politics, church and state need not mix. I agree; it is the basis for this argument. Since the government plays a role in marriages, although our current ideas of marriage stem from religious or Christian beliefs, does not mean the government should follow suit with a particular sect of Christianity's beliefs about marriage. If you believe marriage is between a man and a woman, great, in fact more power to you. I believe Christina Aguilera's has one of best voices of all time, but I am not petitioning the government to make law my beliefs. OK, maybe that's is a false analogy, but I think you get my point.

If the government is going to play a part in marriages-making them legally binding contracts, then they do not need to specify in terms of gender [only opposites sexes] who can participate. If two consenting adults want to express their love in a marriage ceremony, then it is unconstitutional to try and deny them the right to do so. Well, what about the polygamist; Big love style, could they make the same argument? Possibly, but there is not a big movement in this country to legalize polygamy. As a feminist, I believe polygamist's practices tend to exploit and diminish the roles of women, therefore I can't really make a case for it, but it is an interesting question to raise. Once again CHEERS TO MASSACHUSETTS and JEERS to all who want to impose and legalize their faith on our entire nation.

Visit this address

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1447670620070614?feedType=RSS

The Secret....No such thing

I guess you would have been living under a rock for the past few months; I'll say two, if you haven't heard about "The Secret." This self-help book that with Oprah's endorsement has become a hot seller in Books stores across the nation. Author Rhonda Byrne has given the American public this very awesome thing; she has shed some light on "the secret" because "we" the very uninformed American public did not realize that positive thinking could garner such great results in our daily lives. Okay, maybe I am oversimplify things, slightly. I have not read the book, but I have read many articles about it and to be quite honest; what's the big deal? I think a little common sense should tell us all that a positive attitude, actually truly believing in that thing (whatever) it may be in your life can effect some serious change. Well maybe not, maybe a more unsuspecting public will need someone to point out how positive vibes can create, no, even influence positive changes in your life. Still, not a new concept by any means. For example, I will refer to the Bible to make this point. Even if the Bible, the teachings in, it is not your thing; I am not advocating that it should be, but the Bible is filled with stories about "faith" which correlates to maintaining positive energy. So the saying goes "seek and ye shall find," I am compelled to think that maybe these same sentiments are echoed in Bryne's book, too. Again, I ask where's the secret; what's the big deal? I think the bigger secret is Bryne's motives. At the end of the day, and I can't believe I am using that phrase, but it works well here; an author wants to, no needs to make a profit. Byrne knows her audience. She knows their likes, dislikes, fears, anxieties, trials and tribulations. Now, how do you exploit information about your intended audience? You write a book that claims to answer all the problems they (the audience) seem to face. You give them light at the end of a long tunnel.

That is what the secret is my friends; it's not that she is introducing some new way of thinking about life; she is simply doing what advertisers have done for years, repackaging, reinventing-what's old is now new. Of course, I am not trying to short change or belittle the positive experiences anyone has had from reading this book. I am a firm believer that someone can bring you into new knowledge and understanding with a new interpretation or perspective on a topic. Nonetheless, I am a skeptic; I have to question "the Secret" because I really believe that we have heard it all before.

Dissenting Voices and Progressive Thinkers

Al Gore’s eloquently written and in-depth analysis of the American ethos, the Bush Administration’s policies, and the War in Iraq are all critically chronicled in his new book The Assault on Reason. I must admit; before I read this book, I had no idea Gore was such a scholar. He has been a champion of environmental issues for years, but I never equated his lust for a safer environment, one that I share, too, with his informative and well-reason political insight evidenced in his latest book. Of course, I know that most political writing has a very clear purpose and scope. Gore asks his reader to believe as he does in the detrimental state of our nation’s most fundamental characteristics. But, he asks that you not only believe his analysis, but that you are moved to action. I have only read the first two chapters, “The Politics of Fear” and “Blinding the Faith” both speak volumes to the how “reason” is slowly losing its place in American government. Once I finish the book, I will blog away and offer my complete response

Fabulous New Music, hmm...maybe

June 5th, 2007 marks the release of R&B/Pop princess Rhianna's third studio album. Yes, folks it is her 3rd album in three years. It would seem Rhianna maybe taking a page from Mariah Carey's bag of tricks. In the 90's Carey dropped an album about every other year; Rhianna says, "I can do better, how about a new album every year." Although I love and appreciate new music, being the Cancer that I am, I long for the days when you had to wait at least two or three years for a pop star to release new material. Remember the anticipation; you could not wait for that new Prince or Micheal Jackson album.

Anyway on to the new Rhianna album, well, I have only sampled a few tracks on itunes, but it sounds very promising. The beats are current and hip, the Jay-Z influences are very noticeable. Whether or not her music has grown in three years, I am going to take a wild guess and say, um NO. All these songs could have come from her first album, let's face it she's only 19; how much growth can you get in two years? But, I will give "Good Girl Gone Bad" the benefit of the doubt until I can hear every track. So far my initial knee-jerk reaction, 3 stars, stand out track "Shut up and Drive".

July 3, 2007 look forward to Beyonce's Children..oh sorry Destiny's Child's founding member Kelly Rowland to release her second solo project appropriately titled "Miss Kelly". If the first single "Like This" is any indication of what's to come; I am going to love it. I have always loved Kelly's voice and often felt she was overshadowed by Beyonce's insipid vibrato. Maybe this is Kelly's time to shine. Simply because I like her, without even hearing the material, I'm going to give it 3 1/2 stars. Of course, I am known for changing my mind; I'll keep you posted if I do.

Mythical Paragons

I just read an article entitled "Who Says all Gay Men are Stylish" in the June/July 07 issue of Details magazine. It is about gay men and fashion. I have to admit; it hit the nail on the head. Sure, there are many gay men whom are very fashionable fashionistas if you will. But, images in popular culture would have you believe that gay men are all florid icons of fashion. Think Carson Kreesley of "Queer Eye For the Straight Guy" a show devoted to helping straight men realize their inner metro-sexual. The author quotes fashion designer Issac Mizrahi who says fashion experts like most authorities on various topics are schooled and trained. Style is a personal thing and it's very subjective; so asking your best gay friend for fashion tips may not always be a winning combination. If you are a gay man maybe you can relate; or if you a straight man or woman, I bet you think know a gay man with "great" fashion sense. This article helps debunk that myth. That's right folks, myth. You know myths, those generalizations we tend to associate with certain groups, simply because we know people who often really fit the stereotype. You know cultural myths such as all Black people can dance, or all Asian students are smart. I am sure that everyone out there is aware of these myths and you don't buy into them. Of course, at some point we are all guilty of thinking it. How can we help it; our pop culture has its roots in sustaining and perpetuating myths about certain groups of people. For example take recent popular movies such as "Bring it On," "Stomp the Yard," or "The Rink," all depict young urban Black teenagers engaged in some type of dancing activity. Yes, some Black folks have tons of rhythm, but a lot don't. When I am going to see the movie about the Black kid with two left feet? Okay, I slightly digress, but my point is that these myths/stereotypes we see in popular culture seem to serve only one purpose-maintaining very flawed representations.